I have watched lectures from Patrick Moore, former co-founder of Green Peace, who left when he realized they became a communist organization. He has done detailed study of the Earth's temperatures and CO2 levels going back in time to waaaay back. Has a lot of graphs and stats. Videos online.
My take, based on his work and other things I've read:
Life as we know it (animals that breathe oxygen and plants that breath CO2) began about 500,000,000 years ago with the Cambrian Explosion.
In those 500,000,000 years, there is NO CORRELATION between temperatures and CO2 levels.
98% of the Earth's CO2 is stored in the oceans, and it seems that the oceans absorb and release it as needed, through some not yet understood mechanism.
The highest temperatures on Earth since the Cambrian Explosion occured about 50,000,000 years ago. There were no polar ice caps then.
When temperatures heat or cool, the tropics stay about the same, and the farther away from the tropics, the more extreme the change. When the Earth is warm all over, it is about as warm at the poles as at the equator, but the temps at the equator don't change much during the cycles.
About 2,000,000 years ago, the Earth entered the current ice age. We are still in that ice age.
During an ice age, there are glacial periods (when the glaciers come down from the Artic and temps drop) and interglacial periods (when the ice recedes back and temps rise).
We are living in an interglacial period within the ice age, and that has been going on for about 10,000 years -- about the same time man invented agriculture (because the large animals were dying off).
Within that 10,000 years, there have been 300-year cycles and 30-year cycles (maybe others, too). The 30-year cycles are why the climate change hoaxers are always wrong in their predictions (the main reason, anyway). They don't factor natural forces into it because they want everyone to believe it is man-made, and therefore political controls can be implemented.
The average glacial period in this ice age has lasted about 200,000 years, but the average interglacial period only about 10,000 years.
We are due for the end of the interglacial at anytime, but there is no telling when that will happen. These are averages.
When an interglacial period ends and the glacial period begins, it sometimes happens very quicky -- within 10-20 years.
My take is that all of these fluctuations are due to the Earth's orbit vs the Sun and the slightly changing position of the Earth relative to the Sun, not only in its orbit but also on its axis. Could also have to do with activities on the Sun that affect the Earth.
Mankind has had some effect on the rise of CO2 levels in the atmosphere, but it has been a positive effect, not a negative one. We are taking carbon resources from beneath the crust and under the oceans, putting them into the air, and they are recycled by the Earth's system. Plants thrive in such an environment, and that helps animals, too.
Pollution is a different topic, but CO2 increases are excellent for the health of the planet and all living things.
500,000,000 years ago, at the beginning of the Cambrian Explosion, CO2 levels were 2,000 times higher than they are now, and plants and animals thrived.
We have nothing to fear from CO2 or global warming, in general. We should consider the devastating effects of a fast-approching glacial period if it were to occur. Other than that, the polticians and their puppetmasters above them are the real threat to humanity.
Have you heard the idea that the cambrian explosion, far from being a event where life exploded into diverse forms, was in fact a massive die off. I like the idea because the cambrian explosion is a dense fossil record layer which is exactly what you would expect with a large quantity of soft bodied animals dying rapidly. Whereas if they died slowly over time there would be greater opportunity for them to be rotted/eaten by scavengers rather than being covered in sediment in one cataclysm.
Any thoughts?
Have not looked into that. What makes the most sense to me is this:
4.5 billion years ago, Solar System is formed and Earth is a product of that.
For the first 1 billion years, there is violent activity that is not hospitable for life, but the atmosphere is forming.
Over the next 3 billion years, single cell organisms form, and they breathe in the noxious gases from the Earth's formation -- amonium, nitrogen, etc. -- and they breath out oxygen and carbon dioxide, putting those gasses into the atmosphere.
500 million years ago, after 3 billion years of pumping out oxygen and carbon dioxide, there is enough of these molecules in the atmosphere that the Cambrian Explosion happens.
Those early microorganisms probably died off, though some of them may have continued and/or evolved in some way to still be present today as bacteria and other similar microorganisms.
I don't think there can be any serious debate about the fact that the Cambrian Explosion did, in fact, start a process of life as we know it into many diverse forms of animals and plants.
Beyond that, it seems you might be implying that fossils could have laid a foundation that today results in so-called "fossil fuels." Maybe you are not going there, but if you are, I would respond by stating that petroleum is not a fossil fuel. Fossil fuels do not exist.
I have watched lectures from Patrick Moore, former co-founder of Green Peace, who left when he realized they became a communist organization. He has done detailed study of the Earth's temperatures and CO2 levels going back in time to waaaay back. Has a lot of graphs and stats. Videos online.
My take, based on his work and other things I've read:
My take is that all of these fluctuations are due to the Earth's orbit vs the Sun and the slightly changing position of the Earth relative to the Sun, not only in its orbit but also on its axis. Could also have to do with activities on the Sun that affect the Earth.
Mankind has had some effect on the rise of CO2 levels in the atmosphere, but it has been a positive effect, not a negative one. We are taking carbon resources from beneath the crust and under the oceans, putting them into the air, and they are recycled by the Earth's system. Plants thrive in such an environment, and that helps animals, too.
Pollution is a different topic, but CO2 increases are excellent for the health of the planet and all living things.
500,000,000 years ago, at the beginning of the Cambrian Explosion, CO2 levels were 2,000 times higher than they are now, and plants and animals thrived.
We have nothing to fear from CO2 or global warming, in general. We should consider the devastating effects of a fast-approching glacial period if it were to occur. Other than that, the polticians and their puppetmasters above them are the real threat to humanity.
Have you heard the idea that the cambrian explosion, far from being a event where life exploded into diverse forms, was in fact a massive die off. I like the idea because the cambrian explosion is a dense fossil record layer which is exactly what you would expect with a large quantity of soft bodied animals dying rapidly. Whereas if they died slowly over time there would be greater opportunity for them to be rotted/eaten by scavengers rather than being covered in sediment in one cataclysm. Any thoughts?
Have not looked into that. What makes the most sense to me is this:
Those early microorganisms probably died off, though some of them may have continued and/or evolved in some way to still be present today as bacteria and other similar microorganisms.
I don't think there can be any serious debate about the fact that the Cambrian Explosion did, in fact, start a process of life as we know it into many diverse forms of animals and plants.
Beyond that, it seems you might be implying that fossils could have laid a foundation that today results in so-called "fossil fuels." Maybe you are not going there, but if you are, I would respond by stating that petroleum is not a fossil fuel. Fossil fuels do not exist.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12kFZBAP0G/
Do we have a downvoat from an "Earth is only 6,000 years old" pede?
You have two.