Ports full of boats both coasts being denied entry...
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (129)
sorted by:
Perhaps this is the lesson the white hats want us to learn.
EXACTLY. Maybe not so much a lesson but an extreme example of why we should not rely on shit coming from over seas.
They are looking for Club K missile containers sent over by China to perform a decapitation strike from within our own borders.
I'm so glad to see someone else who is keeping up! There's so much hidden that would make normies heads explode. Love ya pede.
There are container ships with diplomatic immunity? Who even owns the ports?
Help me understand where you look to know this? Thanks!
We store our plumbing supplies in a couple storage containers. The local police came to check them out a couple months ago. To make sure we weren't running a meth lab was their excuse. I call bs. In a residential neighborhood?
Yes, meth labs can hide in residences. But the cops have no right to search without a warrant.
Meth labs tend to explode so it could have been a legit concern, especially in a residential neighborhood.
Who knows man. That would be a perfect way to dispatch local law enforcement all over the place to search containers.
Seems very unlikely if you don’t live in a meth type area.
They showed up unannounced?
Please esplain
Google it and look at the images.
China built cruise missiles into standard shilling container boxes. It was a backup plan in case their purchase of the the election went sideways. They could be anywhere. I’m assuming we got intel that they were ramping up the shipments before the election. Fill the US with them, and then all at once take out all major airports. Or anything really. No time to react, they would be attacking us from within our own borders.
Probably part of the reason all of this shit is taking so long. Who knows how many of those got here under Obama
Hey, club k likely on shore already. This system has been around for a long time.
So we get two birds with one stone?
Well looking at the bigger picture, I save more money making food at my house then going out and buying a meal at a restaurant. If the supply chain learned to eat at home then maybe more people could order food at home.
Two fold. Eventually small machine shops will start making parts, mom n pop manufacturers will start making everyday wares just to fill the void. In the mean time retailers will have money in limbo and be unable to stock the shelves. Once the products are allowed to pour in there will be a glut if priduct, margins will fall off, follow-up orders will be slow. Just in time delivery systems with new shiny disposable crap may finally be replaced with durable quality goods. That will be the day we all really win.
Damn good lesson. Except even domestic products are even more expensive lol.
Ask yourself this question: why are domestic products more expensive? Would they be more expensive if businesses acted ethically, and not acting the way the big mega-corporations are today?
If you didn't have multi-millionaire and billionaire owners and corporate heads, goods would probably be a lot cheaper.
Sounds an awful lot like a Bernie Bro talking point.
Tons of small and medium businesses act ethically and barely break even, yet still have a higher production cost than China.
Try looking at government regulations that overreach and a ridiculous tax structure that nickel and dimes every step of trying to run a business.
My point is, profits should not end up in the pockets of only the top management. The guy on the line works just as hard, if not harder than the guy at the top. He should also reap the rewards when his company does well. Likewise, if you've got that much money left over, perhaps you're overcharging your customers, as well.
I worked for a company for many years. We always got the same "merit" raise. It didn't matter whether we had a stellar year, or barely made a profit, we always got the same paltry percentage. Only the company's excuse changed. "Oh, we can't give you more because we had a bad year." "Oh, we can't give you more just because we had a good year, because we might have a bad year next year."
This sort of thing has got to stop. It took everyone to make the company what it is, so profits should have a more even distribution. Likewise, if the company does poorly, everyone should share in that, as well. Too often the bigwigs still get a hefty salary, even when the company does poorly. However, it's only the guys at the bottom that suffer.
Something needs to change to make this more equitable. If the people at the top keep making millions and billions of dollars, while everyone else is suffering, then something is drastically wrong. Perhaps, if you're making that much money, you're overcharging your customers for your product and shortchanging your workers.
We can't have a society that is comprised of only the filthy rich and the struggling poor, as we'll be no better off than we are today. We must find a fair solution for all.
Oh, I agree. I strictly buy American
Perhaps our MIL is searching them or playing the waiting game to fry rats