I've wondered if this is why a lot of doctors are not saying anything.
People tend to forget the Nuremburg Trials were not just about Nazi soldiers / party members. WE all know this though. If you helped perpetrate the lie, you were 100% as guilty as Hilter as far as the trials went.
I mean, if you don't know, you don't know. But that begs to ask, what kind of doctor would be OK giving a patient ( a long term, long history patient at that ) an experimental vax, without fully researching it themselves?
Maybe all it takes is one person to sue their doctor / family doctor for giving the vax to someone who ends up dying?
According to the law, the vax manufacturers cannot be held liable, nor can the hospitals, clinics, doctors or nurses who give the vax shots.
Everyone and everything is legally protected and can't be sued or prosecuted. The vax victim and their family have to deal with the problems.
I have a feeling that the vax manufacturers WILL be liable for falsifying testing data, providing knowingly unsafe "vaccines" with non-disclosed ingredients, failure to disclose known health risks and for false advertising. They will get sued out of existence in the end.
Doctors and hospitals will still enjoy liability protection though. They will use the old line of "We were only following guidelines". "We only had the information they provided us". "We relied on the CDC and FDA recommendations". No doctor, nurse or clinic I know of is worried about liability from the vax.
I do know many nurses and doctors who warn people against the vax or refuse to administer the vax (because they KNOW).
This is a couple weeks old. I hope we hear more examples soon.
I've wondered if this is why a lot of doctors are not saying anything.
People tend to forget the Nuremburg Trials were not just about Nazi soldiers / party members. WE all know this though. If you helped perpetrate the lie, you were 100% as guilty as Hilter as far as the trials went.
I mean, if you don't know, you don't know. But that begs to ask, what kind of doctor would be OK giving a patient ( a long term, long history patient at that ) an experimental vax, without fully researching it themselves?
Maybe all it takes is one person to sue their doctor / family doctor for giving the vax to someone who ends up dying?
According to the law, the vax manufacturers cannot be held liable, nor can the hospitals, clinics, doctors or nurses who give the vax shots.
Everyone and everything is legally protected and can't be sued or prosecuted. The vax victim and their family have to deal with the problems.
I have a feeling that the vax manufacturers WILL be liable for falsifying testing data, providing knowingly unsafe "vaccines" with non-disclosed ingredients, failure to disclose known health risks and for false advertising. They will get sued out of existence in the end.
Doctors and hospitals will still enjoy liability protection though. They will use the old line of "We were only following guidelines". "We only had the information they provided us". "We relied on the CDC and FDA recommendations". No doctor, nurse or clinic I know of is worried about liability from the vax.
I do know many nurses and doctors who warn people against the vax or refuse to administer the vax (because they KNOW).
Yea, I guess it is that cut and dry. Thank you for the clarification.
That argument didn't work so well at Nuremberg. Too bad doctors and nurses don't take much history in college.
Another word for genocide, which sounds far away and not personal is "murder".