no but he would expose himself to heads of state.
they would be called to meetings in his private quarters where WC would be having his bath.
see david irving.
Imposing your cultural norms on those who lived in another time and place then using your feelings to justify jumping to the conclusions your programmers want? Instead of backward gazing, instead perhaps FOCUS on the present and on DOING what you can to help the frontline doers succeed?
“...and then bring me another bottle of 75-year-old brandy!”
" and a boy, the younger the better"
No. Churchill never sought the company of children like kiddie fiddlers do. For anyone to joke about that is irresponsible.
Sorry to break the news Mister_Winston, but Churchill was a piece of shit.
Don't know about the kiddie stuff, but Churchill is the reason WWII happened.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaE5RJJidUg
He just sought the company of fellow capitalist jew owned war mongers who liked to firebomb children. Huge difference
A bugger, cabal (freemason/Illuminati), and the reason for WW2. He was more evil than his winning history will ever tell.
no but he would expose himself to heads of state. they would be called to meetings in his private quarters where WC would be having his bath. see david irving.
Imposing your cultural norms on those who lived in another time and place then using your feelings to justify jumping to the conclusions your programmers want? Instead of backward gazing, instead perhaps FOCUS on the present and on DOING what you can to help the frontline doers succeed?