Would you tolerate a bomb in your body, waiting to detonate if you deviated from the needs of society?
(media.communities.win)
💊 RED PILL 💊
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (117)
sorted by:
So something STOPS working in your body, and then your body doesn’t allow it to live off of others. That’s the opposite of Marxism you absolute idiot.
Killing those who act for their own interests rather than that of the greater whole is core to the communist ethos. The argument is that because it is right for the body it therefore follows it is right for society.
Makes too much money? You're not working for the body anymore, up against the wall
Wrong politics? You're pulling in the wrong direction of the body, up against the wall
It is blowing my mind how none of you have encountered this argument before.
Are policemen necessary? Why or why not?
I'm not arguing the merits or not of any position. I'm explaining to you that this is an actual Marxist argument. Marxists post this. They use it to justify dehumanizing those they feel aren't living for the state, and dreaming of executing them - afterall the body does it so it's perfectly right for me to as well. This protein is a savior for the body, and so I shall be a savior of society executing those I deem cancerous.
All the rest of you seem to be so ashamed that you found yourself tricked by marxist theory that you're trying to pretend it actually hasn't anything to do with marxism.
You ever seen the movie taxi driver? This is a valid discussion, quit shitting all over it.