Lucifer was the Light Bearer, but never the source of Light. He rebelled against God the Light of the World and sought to elevate the light of humanity above the Lord and in His absence. Thus as Lucifer's punishment he is now forever denied the opportunity to bear the Light in any capacity ever again, to the day he and his followers are cast into the lakes of fire.
Do not ever glorify Lucifer, for then you will step into the same world as those who have committed the most unspeakable sins.
Lucifer the light bearer was a carrier of the light but not the originator of the light, until his Fall. Now he is a mere shadow of his pre-Fall self, and now all he bears is shadow, the absence of light. Thus what the Freemasons worship now is shadow, which is the absence of light, of good and of God: that is to say, they now worship evil.
There is no confusion in StormzAComing's statement to "be the light", that is to say partake in the Light of God, while condemning the Satanic adversary, Lucifer the light bearer, because they are not the same thing. Praise the fig fruit (light of God), but if the fig tree bears no fruit (Lucifer, former bearer of light, now bearer of shadow), then the Lord will strike it down.
You would do well to realise that Lucifer's name is now an ironic mockery of his former role.
Lucifer is the light bearer
Lucifer is the biggest loser in all of creation.
Lucifer was the Light Bearer, but never the source of Light. He rebelled against God the Light of the World and sought to elevate the light of humanity above the Lord and in His absence. Thus as Lucifer's punishment he is now forever denied the opportunity to bear the Light in any capacity ever again, to the day he and his followers are cast into the lakes of fire.
Do not ever glorify Lucifer, for then you will step into the same world as those who have committed the most unspeakable sins.
“Unspeakable”...
Do you realize you are parroting made-up corporate media propaganda buzzwords?
Im not trying to glorify anything, just stating the facts.
“The light you seek, is Lucifer”
~ freemasons
It sure looks like you missed the point.
Lucifer the light bearer was a carrier of the light but not the originator of the light, until his Fall. Now he is a mere shadow of his pre-Fall self, and now all he bears is shadow, the absence of light. Thus what the Freemasons worship now is shadow, which is the absence of light, of good and of God: that is to say, they now worship evil.
There is no confusion in StormzAComing's statement to "be the light", that is to say partake in the Light of God, while condemning the Satanic adversary, Lucifer the light bearer, because they are not the same thing. Praise the fig fruit (light of God), but if the fig tree bears no fruit (Lucifer, former bearer of light, now bearer of shadow), then the Lord will strike it down.
You would do well to realise that Lucifer's name is now an ironic mockery of his former role.
Why the downvotes?
Facts are offensive to snowflakes?
http://google.com/search?q=Lucifer+light+bearer