Thanks for the thoughtful reply! Very different from the usual discourse here.
Regarding this comment:
Then I asked her whether alternatives works against Covid and she went quiet. She then whispered that she is not allowed to talk about that.
I have friends who are doctors and I don't hear anything like this. I agree they are busy and aren't always doing all the research, but there is absolutely no hint of a 'conspiracy' to suppress discussion about alternatives. One doctor friend has told me he's quite optimistic about Ivermectin, and he's totally opposed to 'Big Pharma' on many levels (profiting from disease, no incentive to actually 'cure' diseases, etc) but - he said the vaccine itself is a 'fine product' and fit for purpose. His complaint is that the vaccine solution is not suitable for 3rd world countries (financially), and he wants to see (eg) Ivermectin researched and (hopefully) approved for use in those 3rd world countries. But he thinks the vaccine is the best solution and appropriate for (eg) US, UK who can afford it.
I too worked in Silicon Valley my entire career until retirement, but had no issues with the people in general, other than a surprising level of naivety (about how Social Media is destructive). I do think Facebook is fundamentally evil, but not because they censor people; they are evil because they promote conflict and profit from it. I view people like Zuckerberg as immature leaders who are totally out of their depth ... but without evil intent.
I think if you can convince yourself that there are alternate solutions that far surpass the 95% efficacy touted by the vaccines (its dropped drastically even officially) then you will agree there is no necessity to the vaccines. You will also agree there is a conspiracy to hide these cures.
Find the clinical trial(s) for Remdesivir - which was the first approved medicine under EUA. Find out what was the result of that. Ask yourself why anyone would push this.
Find the study in Lancet that proved HCQ was deadly. This study was used to stop all HCQ trials. Confirm for yourself that it was a fraudulent study and was retracted by Lancet (which in itself is unprecedented). Ask yourself why anyone would go out of their way to publish a fraudulent study to prove something as safe as HCQ is dangerous. Remember, papers have to go through multiple layers of safeguards before being published in Lancet. All these people involved in this process are far more well established medical professionals than even normal doctors. Ask yourself why they would do that.
Checkout the clinical trial for Pfizer that was used to get EUA (and also to come up with the 95% efficacy). Convince for yourself that the efficacy data was based on people who caught covid during the study which was < 1%. Verify for yourself that no one in the study actually got hospitalized for Covid - neither in the Control group or in the Vaccine group. Convince yourself that this clinical trial never established that the vaccine stopped even a single person from being hospitalised or dying from Covid.
Find the continuation of that trial - 6 months one. It shows that 6 more people died in the Vaccine group than in the control group from all causes. You can also find the people who got disabled for life in that study who have not been counted in the result nor have they ever been compensated.
Finding the truth requires only one thing. Stop thinking that its impossible to fool/coerce the entire medical community, start looking for the truth by yourself.
If reading all these papers and digging into research is too heavy for you, at least be open to listening to what these preeminent scientists have to say.
Thanks for the thoughtful reply! Very different from the usual discourse here.
Regarding this comment:
I have friends who are doctors and I don't hear anything like this. I agree they are busy and aren't always doing all the research, but there is absolutely no hint of a 'conspiracy' to suppress discussion about alternatives. One doctor friend has told me he's quite optimistic about Ivermectin, and he's totally opposed to 'Big Pharma' on many levels (profiting from disease, no incentive to actually 'cure' diseases, etc) but - he said the vaccine itself is a 'fine product' and fit for purpose. His complaint is that the vaccine solution is not suitable for 3rd world countries (financially), and he wants to see (eg) Ivermectin researched and (hopefully) approved for use in those 3rd world countries. But he thinks the vaccine is the best solution and appropriate for (eg) US, UK who can afford it.
I too worked in Silicon Valley my entire career until retirement, but had no issues with the people in general, other than a surprising level of naivety (about how Social Media is destructive). I do think Facebook is fundamentally evil, but not because they censor people; they are evil because they promote conflict and profit from it. I view people like Zuckerberg as immature leaders who are totally out of their depth ... but without evil intent.
So for those who are interested in learning the truth I offer a few places to start.
(For now, just put aside the fact that your doctor friends dont think anything is amiss, we will come back to it later)
I think if you can convince yourself that there are alternate solutions that far surpass the 95% efficacy touted by the vaccines (its dropped drastically even officially) then you will agree there is no necessity to the vaccines. You will also agree there is a conspiracy to hide these cures.
Find the clinical trial(s) for Remdesivir - which was the first approved medicine under EUA. Find out what was the result of that. Ask yourself why anyone would push this.
Find the study in Lancet that proved HCQ was deadly. This study was used to stop all HCQ trials. Confirm for yourself that it was a fraudulent study and was retracted by Lancet (which in itself is unprecedented). Ask yourself why anyone would go out of their way to publish a fraudulent study to prove something as safe as HCQ is dangerous. Remember, papers have to go through multiple layers of safeguards before being published in Lancet. All these people involved in this process are far more well established medical professionals than even normal doctors. Ask yourself why they would do that.
Checkout the clinical trial for Pfizer that was used to get EUA (and also to come up with the 95% efficacy). Convince for yourself that the efficacy data was based on people who caught covid during the study which was < 1%. Verify for yourself that no one in the study actually got hospitalized for Covid - neither in the Control group or in the Vaccine group. Convince yourself that this clinical trial never established that the vaccine stopped even a single person from being hospitalised or dying from Covid.
Find the continuation of that trial - 6 months one. It shows that 6 more people died in the Vaccine group than in the control group from all causes. You can also find the people who got disabled for life in that study who have not been counted in the result nor have they ever been compensated.
Finding the truth requires only one thing. Stop thinking that its impossible to fool/coerce the entire medical community, start looking for the truth by yourself.
If reading all these papers and digging into research is too heavy for you, at least be open to listening to what these preeminent scientists have to say.
Dr Richard Fleming explains the virus and the vaccine really well
Dr Zelenko tells everything you need to know in 10 mins
Dr Bhakdi explains the ADE reactions
Dr Malone talks about Spike proteins
Declaration by thousands of doctors
Actual doctors discussing vaccine reactions
Brian Ardis about Remdesivir
One of the first articles about origin of virus - good read
Sky news reporting on origin of the virus