Thoughts?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
The whole "we have it all ncswic" line makes no sense if they did not take destruction of evidence into account. The good guys would not leave this much to chance.
The bad guys wouldn't know what the good guys have.
The bad guys can work on the assumption that the white hats "have it all" but why make it easy for them?
Just get rid of everything and then ride on any single missing puzzle piece saying:
The burden of proof is always in our court. That's how they always "win" every argument.
Just as with the "vaccine," they've convinced us that the burden of proof is to show that "vaccines" are dangerous.
In a sane world, it would be on THEM to prove the "vaccines" are safe.