Theory On Meaning Of "Iron Eagle" In Q Posts
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (67)
sorted by:
Just took a quick glance at the blog, and the first thing I see is that since the Bible mentions Egypt frequently but doesn't mention the pyramids, the pyramids must not be as old as claimed: hundreds of years old rather than thousands.
Based on that assumption, which is quite a leap (and a misguided one, I might add), the writer concludes that the King Tut discovery must have also been fabricated and was used as comms to demoralize Germany after WWI.
Does the entire blog use giant leaps of logic, or was I just unlucky to find this right when I began looking at it?
The pyramids themselves aren't central to the story of Moses vs Pharaoh. There aren't many biblical red's to any man made structures except for those that are central to humanity's story, such as the Tower of Babel, Walls of Jericho, King Solomon's Temple, etc. In fact, the Valley of Kings in Luxor aren't mentioned, yet you'd think they would be seeing as how Ramses' and Moses' father would've been buried there. It predates the pyramids, yet there's no mention of it anywhere in the Bible or Talmud.
On that basis alone, your logic is flawed.
Besides, no one truly knows how old the human race is, how far back in the timeline the Exodus really happened, and because of the faults in radio carbon dating, we likely will never know. And we certainly don't know how old these ancient megalithic structures really are.
Just because what's been presented by OP doesn't fall 100% in line with your interpretation of history, doesn't mean this post is wrong. And it doesn't mean your post is wrong, either. It means that we have to keep searching for the truth, wherever it's hiden.
Please reread what I wrote. My whole point was that the blogger's argument (pyramids aren't mentioned in the Bible therefore pyramids must not be that old) made a fantastic and unsupported leap.
The reason I can say this AGREES with what you wrote: the pyramids are not mentioned in the Bible because they play no role in the narrative being considered.
Therefore, if the blogger has such a hopeless failure of reasoning within the first 60 seconds of me reading the blog, there doesn't seem to be much reason to read the blog further as it is based on fantasy rather than reality.