Which he may or may not have done; you can usually submit documents into public record.
Weird I got downvoted on a Q research board for mentioning that providing proof makes your case more sound.
I’m giving the benefit of the doubt in that off camera, he may have submitted studies into the public record. But without any evidence that he did that, it’d be pretty easy for some normie watching this as “but muh peer reviewed evidence”.
You and I don’t need the sources because we already know. But normies will definitely parrot the “debooonked” shit.
Because as a scientist---(some use this dishonestly, but NOT here)---its common knowledge that there's peer reviewed studies proving that (1) masks don't stop a virus and that (2) they do limit oxygen to the wearer. Common knowledge doesn't need citations.
[The 3rd mentioned was how bacterial infections caused by masks made the Spanish flu much worse...offered originally over 20 years ago by Dr. Fauci, before he became a population-busting cabal politician.]
Citing know facts and adding "peer reviewed" for emphasis doesn't require a presentation of documents and citations. Much as.... if you referred to gravity, it wouldn't be necessary to offer a treatise on Isaac Newton.
A demand for proofs on the 3 "peer reviewed" references he made would be pedantic obstructionism and a waste of everyone's time, both in that meeting and on this thread.
No ones demanding anything for the sake of this thread, dude. If he was on video offering to provide documents or references to the research, it would have been way more eye opening for normies. That’s literally my only suggestion here.
As awesome as this was, there was no “proof”, just a bunch of claims of “peer reviewed research”. He never once cited anyone’s work.
Which he may or may not have done; you can usually submit documents into public record. Weird I got downvoted on a Q research board for mentioning that providing proof makes your case more sound.
First you claim there "was no proof" and then you say "may or may not have done."
FYI, I did not downvote either.
... is this all you had to contribute to this thread? Needless antagonizing?
I’m giving the benefit of the doubt in that off camera, he may have submitted studies into the public record. But without any evidence that he did that, it’d be pretty easy for some normie watching this as “but muh peer reviewed evidence”.
You and I don’t need the sources because we already know. But normies will definitely parrot the “debooonked” shit.
Because as a scientist---(some use this dishonestly, but NOT here)---its common knowledge that there's peer reviewed studies proving that (1) masks don't stop a virus and that (2) they do limit oxygen to the wearer. Common knowledge doesn't need citations. [The 3rd mentioned was how bacterial infections caused by masks made the Spanish flu much worse...offered originally over 20 years ago by Dr. Fauci, before he became a population-busting cabal politician.]
Citing know facts and adding "peer reviewed" for emphasis doesn't require a presentation of documents and citations. Much as.... if you referred to gravity, it wouldn't be necessary to offer a treatise on Isaac Newton.
A demand for proofs on the 3 "peer reviewed" references he made would be pedantic obstructionism and a waste of everyone's time, both in that meeting and on this thread.
No ones demanding anything for the sake of this thread, dude. If he was on video offering to provide documents or references to the research, it would have been way more eye opening for normies. That’s literally my only suggestion here.