It seems to be one of the better known techniques. First you get a compliant company that will supply "your" contractors to where they are required. Ernst & Young have been mentioned in that context.
Then you get your agent signed up with them as a trusted contractor. That contractor could be, say, CIA agent Edward Snowdon. When, say the NSA, wants another IT guy they might go to an agency like Ernst & Young and ask for help. They will supply a contractor. That contractor has now effectively infiltrated a US intel agency and is still loyal to his "real" employer, the CIA.
These days, no-one wants to keep a huge IT staff on-hand just in case some work crops up. If you do that you get two major causes of cost. First, you have to pay the IT staff when they are not working on a project and, second, you need to keep them up-to-speed with the latest IT technology and training is expensive. Contractors are popular as a result.
I Apologise if you think I'm "using" it without giving credit...I'm in a different timezone and post as and how I receive info...Sometimes I don't see if there is a duplicate post, so again I apologise if you think I'm "using" the post...I'm not...I don't Use other peoples posts and if I do share someone else post I Always give credit...
It seems to be one of the better known techniques. First you get a compliant company that will supply "your" contractors to where they are required. Ernst & Young have been mentioned in that context.
Then you get your agent signed up with them as a trusted contractor. That contractor could be, say, CIA agent Edward Snowdon. When, say the NSA, wants another IT guy they might go to an agency like Ernst & Young and ask for help. They will supply a contractor. That contractor has now effectively infiltrated a US intel agency and is still loyal to his "real" employer, the CIA.
These days, no-one wants to keep a huge IT staff on-hand just in case some work crops up. If you do that you get two major causes of cost. First, you have to pay the IT staff when they are not working on a project and, second, you need to keep them up-to-speed with the latest IT technology and training is expensive. Contractors are popular as a result.
👍
Sauce: https://thefederalist.com/2021/10/08/durham-investigates-pentagon-cybersecurity-contractors-who-helped-clinton-campaign-plot-russia-hoax/
u/Mukzn posted this yesterday. Why use it without giving credit?
https://greatawakening.win/p/13zg9e5A3N/qproofs-of-contractors-being-inv/c/
I Apologise if you think I'm "using" it without giving credit...I'm in a different timezone and post as and how I receive info...Sometimes I don't see if there is a duplicate post, so again I apologise if you think I'm "using" the post...I'm not...I don't Use other peoples posts and if I do share someone else post I Always give credit...
Anyone got a working link to the Joe DiGenova interview Q mentions in these drops?
Couldn't find the entire clip but Joe DiGenova appeared on The Hill's Rising show on April 20, 2019-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HM_0y8yzxE
Edit: Further searching turned up this article that links to the same YouTube video (since removed) referenced in Drop 3319-
https://100percentfedup.com/just-in-joe-digenova-blows-the-lid-off-of-upcoming-criminal-referrals-for-fisa-court-abuse/
Here's also an article DiGenova wrote on April 22, 2019 that likely sums up what he said on the interview 2 days later-
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/joseph-digenova-victoria-toensing-trump-mueller-report-heres-what-needs-to-happen-next
Thanks! I found the clips of DiGenova's interview here:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/05/02/joe_digenova_john_brennan_isnt_going_to_need_one_lawyer_hes_going_to_need_five.html