I don't quite understand the comparison to Flynn. Isn't Riccardo Bosi ex-boots-on-the-ground special forces while Flynn is more command and management?
I don't think the comparison is that literal. Both are experienced in military, and both are patriots and both are going to kick the butts of their local DS. And since ADF has no other white hats sadly, Riccordo has to fill in all the roles. He was saying that once we cleanup everything, they will try and get some patriot 4-star General from US to come and whip our army into shape.
You already have it!!! via the Common Law, it's called the English Bill of Rights and is applicable in every common law country.
Just via a quick search I can find example of its application in Australian law:
Commonwealth Act of 1987. One of the central provisions of the 1987 Act is section 16. It affirms the application of Article 9 of the English Bill of Rights 1689 to the Federal Parliament.
It's being used right now in legal cases in Canada, this is the reason our entire judicial system has been overwhelmed to slow the fight back.
No law since 1689 can violate the Bill of Rights, in any common law country this includes in America which adopted Common Law as England had once adopted Common Law from the Danelaw, this was acknowledged and defended by the founding fathers as it is the single most important piece of legislation in human history. Government IS NOT, CAN NOT, WILL NOT be above the law, that IS the law, it is applied equally to all including to kings. This is why common law verdicts can and have been used cross countries because our judiciary is not bound by our government but bound by the common law and a common law ruling is a common law ruling.
They do not want us knowing that this is how the law works. They want us under Civic law so we end up in a situation like France, or like China.
This is bigger than people understand, and why we need to fight, fight, fight. Realize this: Hong Kong is under Common Law. If we fall, China wins. If we don't fall, China loses. China taking control of Hong Kong has legally exposed themselves TO OUR LAWS. The situation going on right now like Evergrande is their death knell.
Little. We'll have our OWN constitution, based on the common law. But the good news is, that the US constitution is basically the codification of the common law INTO the national constitution, so in substance, the two will be very, very similar.
US constitution basically took most of the ideas from Locke about the common law and codified it. They did the revolution because they felt clearly that the King of English was contravening common law (natural law) and putting his own corporate and illegitimate law in its place.
I don't quite understand the comparison to Flynn. Isn't Riccardo Bosi ex-boots-on-the-ground special forces while Flynn is more command and management?
I don't think the comparison is that literal. Both are experienced in military, and both are patriots and both are going to kick the butts of their local DS. And since ADF has no other white hats sadly, Riccordo has to fill in all the roles. He was saying that once we cleanup everything, they will try and get some patriot 4-star General from US to come and whip our army into shape.
What do you think the likelihood is that we adopt the US constitution (the unadulterated good stuff) when all of this unfolds?
You already have it!!! via the Common Law, it's called the English Bill of Rights and is applicable in every common law country.
Just via a quick search I can find example of its application in Australian law:
It's being used right now in legal cases in Canada, this is the reason our entire judicial system has been overwhelmed to slow the fight back.
No law since 1689 can violate the Bill of Rights, in any common law country this includes in America which adopted Common Law as England had once adopted Common Law from the Danelaw, this was acknowledged and defended by the founding fathers as it is the single most important piece of legislation in human history. Government IS NOT, CAN NOT, WILL NOT be above the law, that IS the law, it is applied equally to all including to kings. This is why common law verdicts can and have been used cross countries because our judiciary is not bound by our government but bound by the common law and a common law ruling is a common law ruling.
They do not want us knowing that this is how the law works. They want us under Civic law so we end up in a situation like France, or like China.
This is bigger than people understand, and why we need to fight, fight, fight. Realize this: Hong Kong is under Common Law. If we fall, China wins. If we don't fall, China loses. China taking control of Hong Kong has legally exposed themselves TO OUR LAWS. The situation going on right now like Evergrande is their death knell.
Little. We'll have our OWN constitution, based on the common law. But the good news is, that the US constitution is basically the codification of the common law INTO the national constitution, so in substance, the two will be very, very similar.
US constitution basically took most of the ideas from Locke about the common law and codified it. They did the revolution because they felt clearly that the King of English was contravening common law (natural law) and putting his own corporate and illegitimate law in its place.
see
Christian Foundations of the Common Law
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRzY0p4jDpU
for a bit more context
Did he say that?