I was hoping that someone more well versed in this stuff would give a logical counter-analysis against this research, rather than get upset. I gave the TL;DR of the article to it could be the starting point for a debate rather. This is the place we should be not afraid to hold a thought in our head without thinking we are agreeing with it, or without getting angry at that thought itself.
Nothing in that article absolves FBI, CIA, DNC or Obama Admin. Infact, this thread could be extended to show how Obama admin was as implicated as the Bush/Clinton Admin, and perhaps even find clues that this indictment might be aiming at them as well.
Infact, its possible to take this thread and fix it with more clues and perhaps it may turn out that Comey was as much an asshole as we all thought, and he also pulled a lot more people with him that we originally thought. The possibilities are endless.
If this indictment points to the fact that its net is much wider than what we originally though, why would it be a bad thing?
I was hoping that someone more well versed in this stuff would give a logical counter-analysis against this research, rather than get upset. I gave the TL;DR of the article to it could be the starting point for a debate rather. This is the place we should be not afraid to hold a thought in our head without thinking we are agreeing with it, or without getting angry at that thought itself.
Nothing in that article absolves FBI, CIA, DNC or Obama Admin. Infact, this thread could be extended to show how Obama admin was as implicated as the Bush/Clinton Admin, and perhaps even find clues that this indictment might be aiming at them as well.
Infact, its possible to take this thread and fix it with more clues and perhaps it may turn out that Comey was as much an asshole as we all thought, and he also pulled a lot more people with him that we originally thought. The possibilities are endless.
If this indictment points to the fact that its net is much wider than what we originally though, why would it be a bad thing?