I want Anons to show their critical thinking skills on this one. Lots to dig here. The big plot twist here is that this analysis says Comey and Baker were the good guys. It tries to minimise the spying of Trump, but if you read the whole article it becomes clear that spying of Trump followed the same modus operandi as all the previous NSA+FISA abuses, and hence definitely happened but the big deal is that there was so much more than just that.
So if we can suspend our distaste at imagining Comey as anything but a weasel, this story makes a lot of sense. One important connection was the fact that Obama handed over all the email/phone data from NSA to Nustar (The same company thats part of the Sussman indictment). To imagine every email and phone stored on a private company server, which was then used without qualms to try and frame Trump shows how deadly serious this was.
The way this analysis reads, its almost like Trump forced them to violate the FISA laws in his case, exactly how they violated all the times in the past 10-12 years. This is similar to forcing Dems to commit election fraud just like they did all the years prior while being monitored, and also getting FBI to commit Jan 6 false flag just like all the times in the past, but this time being while monitored.
I am open to analysis that digs into his sources (and to his credit he has given a lot of sources from the past) and proves him factually wrong. My guess is, he might still be wrong about Comey & Baker, but his analysis that this ties in with decades long abuses and brings the whole house of cards down from the days of Bush might actually be the real take away.
Well, I recall that he re-opened the Hillary email investigation right smack before the election. It made me wonder why. Hillary can't have liked that.
Whats your fucking game here bubble? This is a load of shit. Ive been researching this since it began. Comey is 100% part of a plot against Trump along with the Obama admin, the DNC and the Hillary campaign.
Comey a good guy? Hes a fucking traitor and you are eating their shit for dinner.
There is a serious lack of knowledge on the intricacies of FISAgate here at GA. You guys talk about the IG report like it was just released. This shit is old, old news. It is why I have begged people to go research the archives at TheConservativeTreehouse.com. I have read these reports. I have read the reports by FISA judges Collyer and Boasberg.
Anything that tries to refute foreknowledge by the FBI and Comey is utter crap. They were all complicit. This isnt a battle between Hillarys campaign and Comeys FBI, it is a plot to destroy President Trump and enslave humanity.
Sundance called out these attempts to distract and misinform to protect the institutions within hours of the Sussman indictment. Letting these traitors inside the governement off the hook is unconscionable.
Its not really about what people think of me. I want everyone here to learn to analyse things critically without getting emotional, and I am happy to keep driving that point home no matter how much they hate me for it. If we don't do this, we are no different than the reddit cult.
No need your starting point is flawed. Anything pointing to absolving the FBI, CIA, DNC, Obama admin of guilt is utter bullshit. I have been reading Sundances impeccable research through this entire travesty. The stuff you guys have been posting here I have delved deep into 5 years ago. That entire thread is misdirection and lies.
I was hoping that someone more well versed in this stuff would give a logical counter-analysis against this research, rather than get upset. I gave the TL;DR of the article to it could be the starting point for a debate rather. This is the place we should be not afraid to hold a thought in our head without thinking we are agreeing with it, or without getting angry at that thought itself.
Nothing in that article absolves FBI, CIA, DNC or Obama Admin. Infact, this thread could be extended to show how Obama admin was as implicated as the Bush/Clinton Admin, and perhaps even find clues that this indictment might be aiming at them as well.
Infact, its possible to take this thread and fix it with more clues and perhaps it may turn out that Comey was as much an asshole as we all thought, and he also pulled a lot more people with him that we originally thought. The possibilities are endless.
If this indictment points to the fact that its net is much wider than what we originally though, why would it be a bad thing?
I want Anons to show their critical thinking skills on this one. Lots to dig here. The big plot twist here is that this analysis says Comey and Baker were the good guys. It tries to minimise the spying of Trump, but if you read the whole article it becomes clear that spying of Trump followed the same modus operandi as all the previous NSA+FISA abuses, and hence definitely happened but the big deal is that there was so much more than just that.
So if we can suspend our distaste at imagining Comey as anything but a weasel, this story makes a lot of sense. One important connection was the fact that Obama handed over all the email/phone data from NSA to Nustar (The same company thats part of the Sussman indictment). To imagine every email and phone stored on a private company server, which was then used without qualms to try and frame Trump shows how deadly serious this was.
The way this analysis reads, its almost like Trump forced them to violate the FISA laws in his case, exactly how they violated all the times in the past 10-12 years. This is similar to forcing Dems to commit election fraud just like they did all the years prior while being monitored, and also getting FBI to commit Jan 6 false flag just like all the times in the past, but this time being while monitored.
I am open to analysis that digs into his sources (and to his credit he has given a lot of sources from the past) and proves him factually wrong. My guess is, he might still be wrong about Comey & Baker, but his analysis that this ties in with decades long abuses and brings the whole house of cards down from the days of Bush might actually be the real take away.
My analysis? How so?
Well, I recall that he re-opened the Hillary email investigation right smack before the election. It made me wonder why. Hillary can't have liked that.
Whats your fucking game here bubble? This is a load of shit. Ive been researching this since it began. Comey is 100% part of a plot against Trump along with the Obama admin, the DNC and the Hillary campaign.
Comey a good guy? Hes a fucking traitor and you are eating their shit for dinner.
There is a serious lack of knowledge on the intricacies of FISAgate here at GA. You guys talk about the IG report like it was just released. This shit is old, old news. It is why I have begged people to go research the archives at TheConservativeTreehouse.com. I have read these reports. I have read the reports by FISA judges Collyer and Boasberg.
Anything that tries to refute foreknowledge by the FBI and Comey is utter crap. They were all complicit. This isnt a battle between Hillarys campaign and Comeys FBI, it is a plot to destroy President Trump and enslave humanity.
Sundance called out these attempts to distract and misinform to protect the institutions within hours of the Sussman indictment. Letting these traitors inside the governement off the hook is unconscionable.
Did u even read the full comment?
I respect you BB but you are eating a turd sandwich here.
Its not really about what people think of me. I want everyone here to learn to analyse things critically without getting emotional, and I am happy to keep driving that point home no matter how much they hate me for it. If we don't do this, we are no different than the reddit cult.
No need your starting point is flawed. Anything pointing to absolving the FBI, CIA, DNC, Obama admin of guilt is utter bullshit. I have been reading Sundances impeccable research through this entire travesty. The stuff you guys have been posting here I have delved deep into 5 years ago. That entire thread is misdirection and lies.
I was hoping that someone more well versed in this stuff would give a logical counter-analysis against this research, rather than get upset. I gave the TL;DR of the article to it could be the starting point for a debate rather. This is the place we should be not afraid to hold a thought in our head without thinking we are agreeing with it, or without getting angry at that thought itself.
Nothing in that article absolves FBI, CIA, DNC or Obama Admin. Infact, this thread could be extended to show how Obama admin was as implicated as the Bush/Clinton Admin, and perhaps even find clues that this indictment might be aiming at them as well.
Infact, its possible to take this thread and fix it with more clues and perhaps it may turn out that Comey was as much an asshole as we all thought, and he also pulled a lot more people with him that we originally thought. The possibilities are endless.
If this indictment points to the fact that its net is much wider than what we originally though, why would it be a bad thing?
Future Proves Past....
Fair enough, now do Baker (I havent really paid attention to this guy until now)