Do they realise that there is actually no mandate? It is just Bai-Den's say so. There is no executive order, and there are no OSHA guidelines. Also they are infringing on all sorts of rights asking for your private medical information.
Let them fire you, and then sue them. You have the law on your side.
Yep, they hope that it keeps people from suing them over it. not the company's fault because of the "mandate", not the government's fault because there is no mandate.
I'm sorry, but it is their (companies who go along with this charade) fault! These damn corporations make their worth off the backs of hard working Americans and they are the one's who are in effect giving these damn so called mandates teeth. These fake mandates would have none effect were it not for certain entities being the errand boys for our despicable government.
It's the same with law enforcement...there's not a gun law on the books that's legal...not one! But the reason these "Illegal" laws have teeth is because there are oath breaking cops who go ahead and do the bootlicking for our tyrannical government! Now the government is no longer the tyranny, it's individuals just doing their jobs...right? I'm just doing what I am told. How'd that work for those very similar Nazi Law Enforcement Officers of the Third Reich!? Can you say Nuremburg Trials? Many of these so called do-gooders did their jobs right into prison and in some cases and early grave.
I have absolutely no sympathy for anyone who goes against the Constitution (however feeble it's been in keeping our government at bay) and in the name of "Just doing my job," thinks they can negate their basic citizenship responsibility of staying true to that document that has allowed them to have the greatest lifestyle the world has ever seen. Corporations are certainly just as guilty with their high-minded, bottom line only, board of directors, who again, are a bunch of Nazi-esque types just doing their jobs right!?
At will employment allows an employer to fire anyone for any reason at any time except for the usual Title VII discriminatory categories such as race, religion, national origin, sex, religion, age, etc. There's no such thing as vaccine discrimination.
Wrong; vaccine discrimination is covered.
Edit: It's covered insofar as you have a religious beef with it.
In addition, 'at will' doesn't cover 'violation of established federal law':
[25 CFR 50.25](
(8) A statement that participation is voluntary, that refusal to participate will involve no penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is otherwise entitled, and that the subject may discontinue participation at any time without penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is otherwise entitled.)
Unapproved products CANNOT be mandated:
Subjects must be notified "(III)of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks."
Just send a letter stating that you identify as a 66 year old Traditionalist Catholic Black LGBT who crossed illegally into the US from Mexico and are using these grounds to refuse the vaxx.
I actually think this needs to be decided in court. If you claim it's dangerous to your health, then it's starts to become a discrimination issue imo. Of course, that's assuming the courts are sane and rational, which they are not.
Do they realise that there is actually no mandate? It is just Bai-Den's say so. There is no executive order, and there are no OSHA guidelines. Also they are infringing on all sorts of rights asking for your private medical information. Let them fire you, and then sue them. You have the law on your side.
Yep, they hope that it keeps people from suing them over it. not the company's fault because of the "mandate", not the government's fault because there is no mandate.
Except that doesn't make any sense. If they act on a mandate that doesn't exist, THEY are at fault and libel. Absolutely sue them.
I'm sorry, but it is their (companies who go along with this charade) fault! These damn corporations make their worth off the backs of hard working Americans and they are the one's who are in effect giving these damn so called mandates teeth. These fake mandates would have none effect were it not for certain entities being the errand boys for our despicable government.
It's the same with law enforcement...there's not a gun law on the books that's legal...not one! But the reason these "Illegal" laws have teeth is because there are oath breaking cops who go ahead and do the bootlicking for our tyrannical government! Now the government is no longer the tyranny, it's individuals just doing their jobs...right? I'm just doing what I am told. How'd that work for those very similar Nazi Law Enforcement Officers of the Third Reich!? Can you say Nuremburg Trials? Many of these so called do-gooders did their jobs right into prison and in some cases and early grave.
I have absolutely no sympathy for anyone who goes against the Constitution (however feeble it's been in keeping our government at bay) and in the name of "Just doing my job," thinks they can negate their basic citizenship responsibility of staying true to that document that has allowed them to have the greatest lifestyle the world has ever seen. Corporations are certainly just as guilty with their high-minded, bottom line only, board of directors, who again, are a bunch of Nazi-esque types just doing their jobs right!?
A good lawsuit should sort it out.
It’s your fault bc you had a “choice”
At will employment allows an employer to fire anyone for any reason at any time except for the usual Title VII discriminatory categories such as race, religion, national origin, sex, religion, age, etc. There's no such thing as vaccine discrimination.
Wrong; vaccine discrimination is covered. Edit: It's covered insofar as you have a religious beef with it. In addition, 'at will' doesn't cover 'violation of established federal law': [25 CFR 50.25]( (8) A statement that participation is voluntary, that refusal to participate will involve no penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is otherwise entitled, and that the subject may discontinue participation at any time without penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is otherwise entitled.)
Unapproved products CANNOT be mandated: Subjects must be notified "(III)of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks."
Just send a letter stating that you identify as a 66 year old Traditionalist Catholic Black LGBT who crossed illegally into the US from Mexico and are using these grounds to refuse the vaxx.
Fast track to CEO
I actually think this needs to be decided in court. If you claim it's dangerous to your health, then it's starts to become a discrimination issue imo. Of course, that's assuming the courts are sane and rational, which they are not.