I am assuming you know the name of the person sending the emails. I am also assuming this person is a teacher or administrator and is sending emails to other teachers and admnistrators. I am also assuming that these people are employees of government (state-funded school).
If so, you can file a freedom of information request (might be called a public records request or something else in your state). In most states, communications of public employees are open records for public disclosure.
You can request all email communications from this particular person (by name, and over a certain time period). You do not have to say why or how you would know to ask for this person's communications. You can probably even do it anonymously if you want.
Once you have these records, you can then go to public school board meetings, parent-teacher meetings, or otherwise meet up with other parents, and get this shit squashed, get transgender discussion prohibited as a matter of school policy, and replace any school board members (with yourself, ideally) if needed to get the job done.
Remember ONE thing: EVERY public employee has a boss, who has a boss, who has a boss, and somewhere up at the top, that particular boss is accountable to We the People. That is how we handle accountability. We TAKE ACTION, not just bitch and complain. If any of these people have advocated for any action by students that is a violation of law, you push to have them removed from their job, and if applicable, file criminal charges against them and civil lawsuits for pain and suffering and emotional distress. The best defense is a good offense. Make THEM squirm for a change.
If you want to have some fun, find an attorney who would be willing to take on a pro bono case for class action against the principal, the school board, the school district, and the city for coercion and emotional distress inflicted on the students and the teachers/admin who did not want to do what the principal wants.
It seems the principal wants to ignore the law and even the school policy and implement their own opinions instead. That is action outside the scope of the principal's authorized legal authority, which means at that moment the principal is acting in their own personal capacity, and NOT as a representative of the school.
That opens the principal up to a direct lawsuit against them, in their personal name, and not as a representative of the school. You just have to find an attorney who is willing to go to the mat on it.
The United States Supreme Court case of Scheuer v. Rhodes settled this issue. Most attorneys do not even know this case because, like doctors, they are told to focus on certain aspects of law and ignore the rest. Conveniently, "the rest" is where we find our rights against the government.
"The immunity of a state from suit has long been held not to extend to actions against state officials for damages arising out of willful and negligent disregard of state laws. The reach of the rule is evident in Scheuer v. Rhodes,166 in which the Court held that plaintiffs were not barred by the Eleventh Amendment or other immunity doctrines from suing the governor and other officials of a state alleging that they deprived plaintiffs of federal rights under color of state law and seeking damages, when it was clear that plaintiffs were seeking to impose individual and personal liability on the officials. There was no “executive immunity” from suit, the Court held; rather, the immunity of state officials is qualified and varies according to the scope of discretion and responsibilities of the particular office and the circumstances existing at the time the challenged action was taken."
-- Q
I took note of it, but did not write down the specific number of the Q post. Also, this part of the court decision was not the "holding" which is the most important.
The holding says this:
“When a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The state has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States” -- Scheuer v. Rhodes 416 US 232 (1974)
That's ideal. You want to get this person fired. The school board in most places are the ones who hire and fire the principal.
You want to gain control of the school board, one way or another. The first step is to bring this cockroach out of the darkness of internal emails and into the light of the parents who pay for the school and their employees.
Public Middle school!
I am assuming you know the name of the person sending the emails. I am also assuming this person is a teacher or administrator and is sending emails to other teachers and admnistrators. I am also assuming that these people are employees of government (state-funded school).
If so, you can file a freedom of information request (might be called a public records request or something else in your state). In most states, communications of public employees are open records for public disclosure.
You can request all email communications from this particular person (by name, and over a certain time period). You do not have to say why or how you would know to ask for this person's communications. You can probably even do it anonymously if you want.
Once you have these records, you can then go to public school board meetings, parent-teacher meetings, or otherwise meet up with other parents, and get this shit squashed, get transgender discussion prohibited as a matter of school policy, and replace any school board members (with yourself, ideally) if needed to get the job done.
Remember ONE thing: EVERY public employee has a boss, who has a boss, who has a boss, and somewhere up at the top, that particular boss is accountable to We the People. That is how we handle accountability. We TAKE ACTION, not just bitch and complain. If any of these people have advocated for any action by students that is a violation of law, you push to have them removed from their job, and if applicable, file criminal charges against them and civil lawsuits for pain and suffering and emotional distress. The best defense is a good offense. Make THEM squirm for a change.
Thank you. Looking into it now
If you want to have some fun, find an attorney who would be willing to take on a pro bono case for class action against the principal, the school board, the school district, and the city for coercion and emotional distress inflicted on the students and the teachers/admin who did not want to do what the principal wants.
It seems the principal wants to ignore the law and even the school policy and implement their own opinions instead. That is action outside the scope of the principal's authorized legal authority, which means at that moment the principal is acting in their own personal capacity, and NOT as a representative of the school.
That opens the principal up to a direct lawsuit against them, in their personal name, and not as a representative of the school. You just have to find an attorney who is willing to go to the mat on it.
The United States Supreme Court case of Scheuer v. Rhodes settled this issue. Most attorneys do not even know this case because, like doctors, they are told to focus on certain aspects of law and ignore the rest. Conveniently, "the rest" is where we find our rights against the government.
Q mentioned this case specifically --
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-11/suits-against-state-officials
"The immunity of a state from suit has long been held not to extend to actions against state officials for damages arising out of willful and negligent disregard of state laws. The reach of the rule is evident in Scheuer v. Rhodes,166 in which the Court held that plaintiffs were not barred by the Eleventh Amendment or other immunity doctrines from suing the governor and other officials of a state alleging that they deprived plaintiffs of federal rights under color of state law and seeking damages, when it was clear that plaintiffs were seeking to impose individual and personal liability on the officials. There was no “executive immunity” from suit, the Court held; rather, the immunity of state officials is qualified and varies according to the scope of discretion and responsibilities of the particular office and the circumstances existing at the time the challenged action was taken."
-- Q
I took note of it, but did not write down the specific number of the Q post. Also, this part of the court decision was not the "holding" which is the most important.
The holding says this:
“When a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The state has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States” -- Scheuer v. Rhodes 416 US 232 (1974)
This person is the principal and yes I know who it is.
That's ideal. You want to get this person fired. The school board in most places are the ones who hire and fire the principal.
You want to gain control of the school board, one way or another. The first step is to bring this cockroach out of the darkness of internal emails and into the light of the parents who pay for the school and their employees.
After reading your reply I was wondering if this precedent could apply to Presidents, Governors, Secretaries of State forcing vaccine mandates?