Not sure if you are just here to troll or if you are just somehow still confused.. if you don't care to take the word from all the anons who have tried to answer your question,, take the words from Q- u/#q4881
Are you talking about the media ones? because the media are the only ones who want there to be Q Anon, no person who follows Q would conceive of themselves as Qanon.
If your just trying to make a classification or an argument for a general term to be used why do you need it to be Q Anon?
QAnon was used because when Q first appeared, just saying “Q” wasn’t deemed specific enough. Q was pretty obscure so there was a sense you might be referring to the character from Star Trek, or the character from James Bond, or the British rock magazine, or the podcast, or the letter. “QAnon” was a way to clarify that.
Not if the defining characteristic of the relationship is Q literally pointing out to make a distinction.
Qanon is what the media have labelled it in order to confuse the issue.
A true NPC at work, frens.
A grade-A retard
Not sure if you are just here to troll or if you are just somehow still confused.. if you don't care to take the word from all the anons who have tried to answer your question,, take the words from Q- u/#q4881
Please stop.
Are you talking about the media ones? because the media are the only ones who want there to be Q Anon, no person who follows Q would conceive of themselves as Qanon.
If your just trying to make a classification or an argument for a general term to be used why do you need it to be Q Anon?
QAnon was used because when Q first appeared, just saying “Q” wasn’t deemed specific enough. Q was pretty obscure so there was a sense you might be referring to the character from Star Trek, or the character from James Bond, or the British rock magazine, or the podcast, or the letter. “QAnon” was a way to clarify that.