That's why mass attendance to sporting events, restaurants and churches were BANNED.
Because nobody would have got sick. The narrative would have collapsed in 60 days if people were not watching from home, holed up like mice in an experiment.
Also, the optics of 60,000 people in a football stadium being broadcast for millions of people to see. Visual proof is strong, add a little prodding for the dull from The Today Show and this is very interdasting.
Fun fact: Wanna know what ended the mask mandates for the Spanish Flu?
"I just recently learned that in 1918, in the midst of the Spanish Flu, which really was a legitimate pandemic, masks were mandated, and the public obediently acquiesced, until they saw a single photo. It had been taken at a boxing match in San Francisco and clearly showed a mayor, a congressman and a public health official, all seated ringside unmasked. In fact, nobody in the massive crowd was masked."
I've said since the beginning of the year, after seeing the studies about masks and all the nasty stuff they have, is that the masks are the problem and what HELPS spread the virus.
I'm probably wrong tho. I just think there's an alternative reason for trying to force folks to wear the stupid things. And those with "mandates" have higher caseloads.
Another Fun Fact: As a result of the Spanish Flu, researchers attempted to find out how the flu was spread. They took samples (snot, etc.) from sick people and had hundreds of healthy people breath it in, swallow it, even inject it into them.
With hundreds of attempts, they could not make ONE person sick from the bodily fluids of a sick person.
That's why mass attendance to sporting events, restaurants and churches were BANNED.
Because nobody would have got sick. The narrative would have collapsed in 60 days if people were not watching from home, holed up like mice in an experiment.
Also, the optics of 60,000 people in a football stadium being broadcast for millions of people to see. Visual proof is strong, add a little prodding for the dull from The Today Show and this is very interdasting.
Fun fact: Wanna know what ended the mask mandates for the Spanish Flu?
"I just recently learned that in 1918, in the midst of the Spanish Flu, which really was a legitimate pandemic, masks were mandated, and the public obediently acquiesced, until they saw a single photo. It had been taken at a boxing match in San Francisco and clearly showed a mayor, a congressman and a public health official, all seated ringside unmasked. In fact, nobody in the massive crowd was masked."
https://patriotpost.us/opinion/82383-were-not-the-only-crazy-ones-2021-09-04
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarkoukis/2021/08/24/tucker-carlson-segment-on-masks-during-spanish-flu-n2594608
History is repeating itself.
Good info. It only took the DS 100 years to repeat this crime against humanity. I only hope that this time, none of them escape justice.
I've said since the beginning of the year, after seeing the studies about masks and all the nasty stuff they have, is that the masks are the problem and what HELPS spread the virus.
I'm probably wrong tho. I just think there's an alternative reason for trying to force folks to wear the stupid things. And those with "mandates" have higher caseloads.
Another Fun Fact: As a result of the Spanish Flu, researchers attempted to find out how the flu was spread. They took samples (snot, etc.) from sick people and had hundreds of healthy people breath it in, swallow it, even inject it into them.
With hundreds of attempts, they could not make ONE person sick from the bodily fluids of a sick person.
The stadium in the picture was filled with 107,000 😎
The Ban was a brilliant divide amd command play. My question is, did they agree because of the white hats told them or they were corrupted beforehand?
...or...everyone would get sick together and it would all be over....heaven forbid the DS can't have that!