The Virology Journal – the official publication of Dr. Fauci’s National Institutes of Health – published what is now a blockbuster article on August 22, 2005, under the heading – get ready for this – “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” (Emphasis mine throughout.) Write the researchers, “We report…that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.”
This means, of course, that Dr. Fauci (pictured at right) has known for 15 years that chloroquine and it’s even milder derivative hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) will not only treat a current case of coronavirus (“therapeutic”) but prevent future cases (“prophylactic”).
So HCQ functions as both a cure and a vaccine. In other words, it’s a wonder drug for coronavirus. Said Dr. Fauci’s NIH in 2005, “concentrations of 10 μM completely abolished SARS-CoV infection.”
Fauci’s researchers add, “chloroquine can effectively reduce the establishment of infection and spread of SARS-CoV.”
Because of research done by the National Institutes of Health, of which he is the director. In connection with the SARS outbreak – caused by a coronavirus dubbed SARS-CoV – the NIH researched chloroquine and concluded that it was effective at stopping the SARS coronavirus in its tracks.
The COVID-19 bug is likewise a coronavirus, labeled SARS-CoV-2. While not exactly the same virus as SARS-CoV-1, it is genetically related to it, and shares 79% of its genome, as the name SARS-CoV-2 implies. They both use the same host cell receptor, which is what viruses use to gain entry to the cell and infect the victim.
Well, the first line is wrong, as is most of the rest.
The Virology Journal isn't published by the NIH, it's published by a for-profit company that Fauci has nothing to do with. So, the rest of the article goes on to refer to the researchers as "Fauci's Researchers" - they aren't. They have nothing to do with each other.
If you can't get the first sentence right, then why bother even reading the rest?
So, then further down it says Fauci is the director of the NIH, he isn't. He's the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases - which is just one of 27 different departments at the NIH. He didn't hold the director role 15 years ago.
I'm not defending Fauci, he's a piece of shit, but let's at least try to be slightly accurate so people don't all us liars.
It’s very true that we can’t fight their attempts to cast peoples health in jeopardy because of their political whims if there are glaring mistakes. Gives me hope for this movement and I’m proud to stand behind it when exaggerating and fake videos are questioned. It’s easy to fall into the same traps they do out of spite, but that doesn’t win any online battles.
This is enough evidence for me:
The Virology Journal – the official publication of Dr. Fauci’s National Institutes of Health – published what is now a blockbuster article on August 22, 2005, under the heading – get ready for this – “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” (Emphasis mine throughout.) Write the researchers, “We report…that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.”
This means, of course, that Dr. Fauci (pictured at right) has known for 15 years that chloroquine and it’s even milder derivative hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) will not only treat a current case of coronavirus (“therapeutic”) but prevent future cases (“prophylactic”).
So HCQ functions as both a cure and a vaccine. In other words, it’s a wonder drug for coronavirus. Said Dr. Fauci’s NIH in 2005, “concentrations of 10 μM completely abolished SARS-CoV infection.”
Fauci’s researchers add, “chloroquine can effectively reduce the establishment of infection and spread of SARS-CoV.”
Because of research done by the National Institutes of Health, of which he is the director. In connection with the SARS outbreak – caused by a coronavirus dubbed SARS-CoV – the NIH researched chloroquine and concluded that it was effective at stopping the SARS coronavirus in its tracks.
The COVID-19 bug is likewise a coronavirus, labeled SARS-CoV-2. While not exactly the same virus as SARS-CoV-1, it is genetically related to it, and shares 79% of its genome, as the name SARS-CoV-2 implies. They both use the same host cell receptor, which is what viruses use to gain entry to the cell and infect the victim.
https://stillnessinthestorm.com/2020/07/cover-up-fauci-approved-hydroxychloroquine-15-years-ago-to-cure-coronaviruses-nobody-needed-to-die/
Well, the first line is wrong, as is most of the rest.
The Virology Journal isn't published by the NIH, it's published by a for-profit company that Fauci has nothing to do with. So, the rest of the article goes on to refer to the researchers as "Fauci's Researchers" - they aren't. They have nothing to do with each other.
If you can't get the first sentence right, then why bother even reading the rest?
So, then further down it says Fauci is the director of the NIH, he isn't. He's the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases - which is just one of 27 different departments at the NIH. He didn't hold the director role 15 years ago.
I'm not defending Fauci, he's a piece of shit, but let's at least try to be slightly accurate so people don't all us liars.
It’s very true that we can’t fight their attempts to cast peoples health in jeopardy because of their political whims if there are glaring mistakes. Gives me hope for this movement and I’m proud to stand behind it when exaggerating and fake videos are questioned. It’s easy to fall into the same traps they do out of spite, but that doesn’t win any online battles.
I'm not going to research your nit-picking. I don't give a shit who wrote it. It's true. I am finished discussing this topic with you.
Sounds about right.
Make wild claims, then when you're bullshit is pointed out you run away.