Are the vaxxed GMO and no longer qualifying as humans and therefore HAVE NO HUMAN RIGHTS? Thoughts, impressions, feels?
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
Question proposed while getting input from faraway friends.
mRNA can’t change your DNA, mRNA feeds into Ribosomes to make proteins.
A spiked protein is not a reverse transcriptase.
The action between the mRNA and “the cell” is the Ribozome making whatever is encoded in the mRNA.
It only becomes permanent if the DNA is modified to produce the spiked protein.
I know we think mankind can do this, but we can’t. We can barely splice in code edits using CRISPR/cas9, and even then, we don’t enough to do anything major like create a whole new gene.
u/#Wrong
SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome
Prolonged SARS-CoV-2 RNA shedding and recurrence of PCR-positive tests have been widely reported in patients after recovery, yet these patients most commonly are non-infectious. Here we investigated the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome and that transcription of the integrated sequences might account for PCR-positive tests. In support of this hypothesis, we found chimeric transcripts consisting of viral fused to cellular sequences in published data sets of SARS-CoV-2 infected cultured cells and primary cells of patients, consistent with the transcription of viral sequences integrated into the genome. To experimentally corroborate the possibility of viral retro-integration, we describe evidence that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse transcribed in human cells by reverse transcriptase (RT) from LINE-1 elements or by HIV-1 RT, and that these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed. Human endogenous LINE-1 expression was induced upon SARS-CoV-2 infection or by cytokine exposure in cultured cells, suggesting a molecular mechanism for SARS-CoV-2 retro-integration in patients. This novel feature of SARS-CoV-2 infection may explain why patients can continue to produce viral RNA after recovery and suggests a new aspect of RNA virus replication.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33330870/
u/#Fakenews
Reverse-transcribed SARS-CoV-2 RNA can integrate into the genome of cultured human cells and can be expressed in patient-derived tissues
Prolonged detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA and recurrence of PCR-positive tests have been widely reported in patients after recovery from COVID-19, but some of these patients do not appear to shed infectious virus. We investigated the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the DNA of human cells in culture and that transcription of the integrated sequences might account for some of the positive PCR tests seen in patients. In support of this hypothesis, we found that DNA copies of SARS-CoV-2 sequences can be integrated into the genome of infected human cells. We found target site duplications flanking the viral sequences and consensus LINE1 endonuclease recognition sequences at the integration sites, consistent with a LINE1 retrotransposon-mediated, target-primed reverse transcription and retroposition mechanism. We also found, in some patient-derived tissues, evidence suggesting that a large fraction of the viral sequences is transcribed from integrated DNA copies of viral sequences, generating viral-host chimeric transcripts. The integration and transcription of viral sequences may thus contribute to the detection of viral RNA by PCR in patients after infection and clinical recovery. Because we have detected only subgenomic sequences derived mainly from the 3' end of the viral genome integrated into the DNA of the host cell, infectious virus cannot be produced from the integrated subgenomic SARS-CoV-2 sequences.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33958444/
OP stated mRNA from the vaccines can't change your DNA.
2 separate studies suggested reverse-transcribed RNA can change DNA. Considering the mRNA vaccine works in exactly the same way, hijacking your cellular machinery to manufacture the spike proteins, it's only common sense it's possible they can also alter DNA.
OP's statement is a hypothesis and nothing more. As OP presented it as fact, I labeled it as fake news.
Looks solid to me.
If smoking weed can alter your DNA https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2174024/
Then injecting yourself with anything or something we don't know could alter your DNA
I suppose that is valid. I would note that in the cannabanoid example, the mechanism to modify the DNA is a part of the system.
I don’t buy the mRNA in the vaccine is modifying DNA, though.
But I could be proven wrong.
I guess the question really is how do we know its not altering DNA. They have lied about everything else.
I don’t see how it can, the mRNA feeds into a Ribosome that produces a membrane spiked protein which eventually ends up on the outer surface of the cell.
The end. Nothing happened to the DNA.
I get your point. However what I'm saying is that how do you know without a 100% absolute doubt that the clot shot is just an mRNA shot. If it were just an mRNA shot then i have to completely agree with your conclusion. I'm saying we don't know and we should not speculate that we do know. To further my point we have been consistently lied too regarding all matters coronavirus related. I think there's a lot more too this than any of us know.