I think Devolution is a perfectly fine theory, but does patelpatriot just get his information through intuition? On what authority does he write what he does?
He has also made a point to say that he isn't a Q guy, and that all of his conclusions are reached independently of Q.
Oh WOW..... I didn't know that..... lends even more credence to him now!!!
Simply because it's reassuring to see others independently and with other sources arrive to the same conclusions as we do, ya know?
I'm on board with Q, The Plan, etc (though I do get down from time to time) but it absolutely is very nice to have the reassurance I'm not nuts.
I'm constantly looking for new / more data points, constantly trying to prove / disprove myself, constantly testing my theories and knowledge, so it is really huge for me that Patel is NOT a Q guy.....massive....
Yes I know Wictor isn't; he certainly makes NO bones about it.
That entire QV forum (Kek) where he posts; any mention of Q that isn't totally negative; if you aren't a vehement Q-basher, you get pretty much instantly banned from there, from what I gather.
So again; quite a few relatively sharp people on QV, and it's been very reassuring to me to know that they hate Q.
What does it tell you when a group of smart people reach the exact same conclusions as we do, but not only using an entirely different data set, but they outright think our data (Q drops) are total BS?
I think Devolution is a perfectly fine theory, but does patelpatriot just get his information through intuition? On what authority does he write what he does?
Just based on research and publically available info. Much of it is sourced in his articles. He has never claimed to have inside sources or anything.
He has also made a point to say that he isn't a Q guy, and that all of his conclusions are reached independently of Q.
Oh WOW..... I didn't know that..... lends even more credence to him now!!! Simply because it's reassuring to see others independently and with other sources arrive to the same conclusions as we do, ya know?
I've thought the same thing. Reassures me that this isn't an echo chamber and I'm not just seeing things ya know?
Wictor is also not a Q guy btw.
Yes, exactly!!!
I'm on board with Q, The Plan, etc (though I do get down from time to time) but it absolutely is very nice to have the reassurance I'm not nuts.
I'm constantly looking for new / more data points, constantly trying to prove / disprove myself, constantly testing my theories and knowledge, so it is really huge for me that Patel is NOT a Q guy.....massive....
Yes I know Wictor isn't; he certainly makes NO bones about it. That entire QV forum (Kek) where he posts; any mention of Q that isn't totally negative; if you aren't a vehement Q-basher, you get pretty much instantly banned from there, from what I gather.
So again; quite a few relatively sharp people on QV, and it's been very reassuring to me to know that they hate Q.
What does it tell you when a group of smart people reach the exact same conclusions as we do, but not only using an entirely different data set, but they outright think our data (Q drops) are total BS?
Must really irk them, actually.... 😁😁😁