You're awake for a reason, don't waste it.
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
With Btc or any other crypto THEY control the system because you are dependent upon other people's computers to ever get anything for your crypto, they can not only define value but who gets to spend what where.
Not perfectly but a LOT easier for them than with physical currency(look at what they can do with social media bot-farms, crypto would only be a different kind of ones and zero's for them...), which still only has as much value as they assign it and they can physically make it but it it is still better than crypto of it has to physically exist and is tied to real resources with value.
The best system would be the barter system(which is actually still used by large resource entities every once in a while when they need/want to get something for something...which should be a testament to it's validity) but that isn't large scale practical so the closet thing to the barter system is physical currency tied to physical resources as the best compromise...
I'm not arguing that we should or shouldn't have crypto. As I said, I'm aware of the control over people it gives. My argument is that they - deep state, central bankers etc - are foremost interested in currency printing and the control over countries that gives them. Control over people is just an added bonus, but I just can't see them endorsing crypto like BTC, that would remove their control over countries.
Countries are people, control over people will give them control over countries far more efficiently than printing the money that the people at the top want/need.
Why do you think they spend such efforts on controlling media, entertainment and socials.
It's all about controlling the people..............