Scavino Drops the Confirmation. Tweet time stamp matches Q drop # which also is a 1 year delta tomorrow. TRUTH is here.
(media.greatawakening.win)
Q-analysis!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (154)
sorted by:
Either Q is real or Q is literally Dan Scavino 5D chess trolling us. Honestly I'm impressed either way.
Either Q is real of Trump would have disavowed it long ago when millions of his most die-hard support base began following the info in the Q drops.
He could have easily disavowed it to nothingness in a single tweet, or in that press conf when the bubblehead asked him about this conspiracy thing that's against child trafficking. Instead Trump said "Is that supposed to be a bad thing or a good thing?" and "I don't know anything about them but they seem like great people who love Trump and love our country."
It's real, doomers. Get over yourselves.
Indeed. If it was a Larp....it is one where Trump and the military is in on it.
So either he is either biggest evil of all giving half the world false hope in the most elaborate psyop in human history, so to crush everyones hopes to utter bits before the 1000 years of darkness reigns, or its all real.
If it's a psyop the world is doomed. But either way...Trump is in on it.
Lol same🐸👌🇺🇸
Lol love you feelsgoodman. Your emoji string is practically trademark by now.
Ha, thanks! I'm sure it annoys anti-emoji people, but 🐸👌🇺🇸❤😁is such a succinct way to say it all!
Trump would be in on it if the latter were the case.
wanted to upvote this but they were at 17 :)
Or Dan Scavino is intentionally tweeting based on historical Q posts. Doesn't require too much 5D chess to do that.
One problem with this, did Dan control that the word TRUTH is in the Q post, so he could tweet the name of the new social media by TRUMP that "just happens"too be TRUTH?
Nice try to doom this one.
Not dooming at all. I was just pointing out that it's very easy to appear to be playing 5D chess when you're referencing historical predictions. To your point, it's a bit less "coincidental" in this case, since Dan didn't have any control over the name of Trump's platform.