Coincidence?...
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (38)
sorted by:
There were a bunch of rumors very early on by people who claimed to have inside knowledge that entire shipments were being replaced by saline because of the initial side effects, and they needed to keep the number of adverse reactions low, statistically.
The motivation certainly checks out, but there was no way to confirm whether or not those claims were true at the time (though we all hoped they were).
Turns out, they may have been true. Which means getting the real jab could have a MUCH higher rate of adverse reactions (or death).
When was this reported? My wife, who works at a lab in a hospital, got jabbed at the end of Jan/begining of Feb and she hasn't showed any side effects to my knowledge.
I don't remember any exact dates, I just remember the posts on the chans, here, and tdw, around the time the vaccines were first made available to the public.
At the time, I personally thought the claims seemed credible, but without any evidence, there's not much to do with that information.
After the 2020 election, we'll need to audit everyone involved with creating and administering the vaccines.
My aunt and uncle are the same. They had very little reactions to the vaccines.
There are dates on the articles pictured. I see dates between March and July.
even if not saline its likely that they had batches that were not very high side effect for their most loyal of followers... those that rush in line to immediately get the shot
Imagine getting paid billions or trillions for saline solution. Fucking brilliant. And I'd honestly prefer that were the whole story vs. the alternative.
Perhaps. It's all speculation of course.
There were plenty of "first vaxed" that did have negative side effects. But it was also strange that the initial reports showed that 80% of the negative side effects reported (including death) all came from the same like 12 or so locations -- which would imply that if they were swapping with saline, it may have been the vast majority of jabs. Alternatively, those locations just all had bad vials (though I'm not sure how it could be worse than what's supposed to be in it already).
I don't have that spreadsheet anymore that showed the adverse reaction table broken down by location, but it was circulating on the wins for a while. Someone else may still have it?