Another interesting article from SputnikNews. Yes it’s Russian and from their own spin. But it’s not covered in US media sugar. I’m thinking it’s just a bit more factual than our Lamestream news haha. Anyway this article discusses maybe why The White House backed off on defending Taiwan today after Biden said we would help them. The War Game simulations being run shows 18 for 18 tries, the US looses to China in the fight/war. Again, this has some spin on it, but they also discuss how demoralized our military currently is, our loss in Afghanistan, and our military technology and strategy being well behind China’s alone. So some interesting info/Intel in here.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
"Why not Taiwan?" is a good question to ask. But so is "Why Taiwan?" It's interesting that Q doesn't mention either Taiwan or Taipei ever. I'm open to the idea that it's not what it seems, even that it's become a DS playground, but I haven't seen any Geneva-style connections centered on Taiwan. Do you have more than HSBC? Or were you just keeping the idea open?
I fell down this particular rabbit hole 25 days ago when things really heated up in the straights and shortly thereafter U.S. Marine Corps F35-Bs practicing TOLs off the Japanese aircraft carrier Iszumu off the coast of Japan on 03 October 2021 really piqued my interest in keeping an eye on what's going on around Taiwan...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9KnjYWls94 (8 min / 9 sec)
From thread in post below / 29 Sept 2021 https://greatawakening.win/p/13zN6Hof6W/extremely-rare-and-aggressive-re/
What does Q have to say about Taiwan?
https://qagg.news/?q=Taiwan
Isn't that interesting.
https://youtu.be/fNfpel0c2J8?t=2147
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Adventure_of_Silver_Blaze
If you are really interested in HSBC Bank connections to CCCP get that book, it is incredibly well written and footnoted. The B&N blurb just scratches the surface...
"The Sassoons and the Kadoories stood astride Chinese business and politics for more than one hundred seventy-five years, profiting from the Opium Wars; surviving Japanese occupation; courting Chiang Kai-shek; and nearly losing everything as the Communists swept into power. Jonathan Kaufman tells the remarkable history of how these families ignited an economic boom and opened China to the world, but remained blind to the country's deep inequality and to the political turmoil on their doorsteps. In a story stretching from Baghdad to Hong Kong to Shanghai to London, Kaufman enters the lives and minds of these ambitious men and women to forge a tale of opium smuggling, family rivalry, political intrigue, and survival."
This book, 'The Last Kings of Shanghai' (there was nothing last about them), 'Red Notice' by Bill Browder, (this is the John McCain Magnitsky Act Hoax that is the prequel to the Russia Hoax) and a book titled 'The Mongols' by Jeremiah Curtain (1907) are the three books I recommend to people who have embraced the concept that 1) there are Deep States in all governments world wide and 2) the Deep State establishment staffs (the Clintons, Obamas, Bidens, etc...) are controlled by Puppet Masters and 3) this has been going on for a long, long, long time.
Here is another book you want to get and read...
ttps://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/puppet-masters-robert-a-heinlein/1101116701?ean=9781647100469
Available for Pre-Order. This item will be available on December 7, 2021
"At the beginning of a forest fire or an epidemic there is a short time when a minimum of correct action will contain and destroy."
pg 25 / The Puppet Masters / 1951
And just to make the point about it having been going on for a long time these house investigations from 1952 Cox Hearings and 1954 Reece Hearings exposes the Deep State and details how the mass gaslighting and psychological manipulation is accomplished and were the money comes from...
http://www.channelingreality.com/Hearings/cox_and_reese_hearings.htm
Wiki backgrounder:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_Select_Committee_to_Investigate_Tax-Exempt_Foundations_and_Comparable_Organizations
See this link for more on cox reece hearings (from 3 months ago):
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jJimY5Ue/techno-fog--something-more-signi/
This book by Rene A. Wormser, who was counsel for Reece Hearings, is a digest of the those hearings, well written, but you have to read the testimonies from the foundation representatives to get the full horrid picture.
https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/foundations-rene-a-wormser/1119584100?ean=9781939438249#
"This is a searching analysis of some of America's most powerful tax-exempt foundations, their actions as opposed to their stated purpose's, the interlocking groups of men who run them, and their influence on the country at large. The author, as counsel to the Reece Committee, which investigated foundations for the last Republican Congress, gained a unique insight into the inner workings of the various Rockefeller, Carnegie and Ford-created giants. He also witnessed the intense and powerful opposition to any investigation of these multi-billion-dollar public trusts. The Reece investigation was virtually hamstrung from the start to its early demise, which was aided and abetted by leading newspaper of the country. "It is difficult for the public to understand," writes Mr. Wormser, "that some of the great foundations which have done so much for us in some fields have acted tragically against the public interest in others, but the facts are there for the unprejudiced to recognize." "The power of the individual foundation giant is enormous. When there is like-mindedness among a group of these giants, which apparently is due to the existence of a closely knit group of professional administrators in the social science field, the power is magnified hugely. When such foundations do good, they justify the tax-exempt status which the people grant them. When they do harm, it can be immense harm - there is virtually no counter-force to oppose them."
Thanks for the detailed answer with links. I looked up a bunch of them. Haven't done the books yet.
I agree Q's lack of mention of Taiwan is interesting on its own. Even "ROC" brings up nothing but "roc"kets. And I'm sold on HSBC- they were born for slave trading under a full opium moon, and adapted well to the CCCP. That said, I still haven't seen anything to support the idea that Taiwan ought to be publicly sacrificed.
Just as I believe losing Afghanistan meant gaining integrity for the good guys and losing a playground for the bad guys (as explained here: https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/08/19/afghanistan-tax-funded-child-abuse/), I'm open to seeing Taiwan change into something better than it is, or being something different than what it appears. But even if DS is present in Taiwan, I haven't seen anything to suggest it's a Clown house like NK was. That's what I was looking for.
Here is a Q search for CCP.
https://qagg.news/?q=ccp
Disregard #3896... return drop ref CCP is to an embedded link in the drop, not Q original text.
Pay very close attention to when CCP is in brackets [ ] and when not in brackets.
Pay very close attention to how Q breaks out the abbreviation [CCP].
And, like with Taiwan... there is this...
https://qagg.news/?q=Chinese+Communist+Party
Sometimes what is not there is as telling and is as important as what is there.
Very few Q analysts have commented on what is missing from Q commentary that one would have expected.
President Trump has always been very careful in his remarks to distance President Xi's statements and actions from Chinese Communist Party statements and actions.
So have President Xi and President Putin when commenting about President Trump and establishment Democrat and Republican statements and actions.
Suspend disbelief and a lot of things that do not make sense make sense.
Thanks. Discernment is certainly key.
CCP in drops is "Control and Command Positions" not "Chinese Communist Party." Can only even find 4 drops with the word "communist" and only 2 include China and communist together:
There are CCPs in China (the communists?), as in seemingly every major country (also communists?). Taiwan isn't there. Chinese Communist Party isn't there. China is certain in many posts. In my view there is has only been 1 China... the Communist Puppets are occupiers. To acknowledge Taiwan is to concede that there are 2 Chinas. Is Xi actually working against the puppets, against the communists? Take down from within?