Now I get it. The CIA directs and funds hollywood and that's how they orchestrated this whole scheme where they got the victim her job on set. Alec Baldwin was just the pansy this time. CIA used its agent to hand alec Baldwin the deadly pistol to take out the director. Now I get it. ... It's not Alec Baldwin's fault. He was tricked.
She was the camera operator, if he was pointing the gun at the camera then it would make sense that she would be hit. It would also make sense for the director to be hit if the bullet passed through her and hit him as the directors are often standing next to the camera operators watching how the scene is coming across on camera on an external monitor
No coincidence. The real perp knew alec Baldwin is an intense focused actor who can hit his mark for filming and would therefore shoot exactly where instructed (probably by the victim herself). Interesting to know if the script was delivered to the victim with directions for the actor to shoot directly into camera.
Baldwin still had the responsibility to check the weapon first.
Why was he using a real gun instead of a prop gun?
Why did he fire it without first checking what was in it?
He is responsible for firing the shots (x 2), and others are also responsible for putting real bullets into a real gun (x 2) that should have been a prop gun on a movie set.
I saw something where Jensen Ackles, who is also in the film talking about the poor training he got and it appears the picture they are trying to paint is that the people who are supposed to train the actors are negligent. There is also a story about how it was a local non-union crew because the rest walked off the set (the ranch is in Santa Fe but they would not let the crew stay in motels there,and were forcing them to drive to Albuquerque which is 63 miles from Santa Fe; long hours etc.
This is my tinfoil hat theory - they want to make it look like the locals are a bunch of deplorable boobs. But I wonder if the goal was to get the real crew away because they would know if something was wrong. Now you bring in a 'local' crew and...oops....
Edit to add: my tinfoil hat is on because it makes zero sense to have the crew stay in Albuquerque. It's not like they are saving money for the production. But it sure pissed them off...
Now I get it. The CIA directs and funds hollywood and that's how they orchestrated this whole scheme where they got the victim her job on set. Alec Baldwin was just the pansy this time. CIA used its agent to hand alec Baldwin the deadly pistol to take out the director. Now I get it. ... It's not Alec Baldwin's fault. He was tricked.
That leads to the most important questions of all:
What did Brandon Lee know?
Was the Nascar Brandon meme an MKULTRA plot designed to bring this full circle?
Even if all of this was orchestrated, what are the chances that Baldwin would shoot and kill the intended target by accident?
Yeah, I was really doubting the reality of this reality even before seeing that. Now I'm pretty sure none of this is real. Just a weird dream?
I agree with that possibility. This is a neutral question: Why would he point the gun at Halya?
She was the camera operator, if he was pointing the gun at the camera then it would make sense that she would be hit. It would also make sense for the director to be hit if the bullet passed through her and hit him as the directors are often standing next to the camera operators watching how the scene is coming across on camera on an external monitor
That's plausible. It would be great to know if they were filming or rehearsing a scene like that.
Somebody else mentioned that cameras downsight of a gun are unmanned by convention. I guess this wouldn't be the case in your suggestion
No coincidence. The real perp knew alec Baldwin is an intense focused actor who can hit his mark for filming and would therefore shoot exactly where instructed (probably by the victim herself). Interesting to know if the script was delivered to the victim with directions for the actor to shoot directly into camera.
Baldwin still had the responsibility to check the weapon first.
Why was he using a real gun instead of a prop gun?
Why did he fire it without first checking what was in it?
He is responsible for firing the shots (x 2), and others are also responsible for putting real bullets into a real gun (x 2) that should have been a prop gun on a movie set.
Is this a sag rule?
I saw something where Jensen Ackles, who is also in the film talking about the poor training he got and it appears the picture they are trying to paint is that the people who are supposed to train the actors are negligent. There is also a story about how it was a local non-union crew because the rest walked off the set (the ranch is in Santa Fe but they would not let the crew stay in motels there,and were forcing them to drive to Albuquerque which is 63 miles from Santa Fe; long hours etc.
This is my tinfoil hat theory - they want to make it look like the locals are a bunch of deplorable boobs. But I wonder if the goal was to get the real crew away because they would know if something was wrong. Now you bring in a 'local' crew and...oops....
Edit to add: my tinfoil hat is on because it makes zero sense to have the crew stay in Albuquerque. It's not like they are saving money for the production. But it sure pissed them off...