Dude you need to pick one, either accept government accepted history or pick non-governmental primary sources. You wanna play both sides because the narrative you choose to believe is not the truth.
I am literally making a historical site on US history from the year 1817 to 2021 And your logical fallacy of thinking someone needs to be a respected historian is laughable. How do you suppose someone learn recently history like NAZI Germany? You say its not what history teaches us, and so I tell you I am getting information from the people there. The primary source. And you have issue with it. You would rather hear it from someone who wasn't there because it fits with a narrative you agree with. I do enjoy a good debate.
I am not getting my information from the corporate news. I am getting it from primary sources people who where there. Jews. Soldiers, their children.
So, anecdotal and undocumented.
As opposed to?
Dude you need to pick one, either accept government accepted history or pick non-governmental primary sources. You wanna play both sides because the narrative you choose to believe is not the truth.
touched a nerve, did I ?
You're not a respected historian, guy. lol
Your anecdotal understanding of the world based on 'people I talk to' is way too narrow and does not support a comprehensive view.
You like to argue, don't you?
I am literally making a historical site on US history from the year 1817 to 2021 And your logical fallacy of thinking someone needs to be a respected historian is laughable. How do you suppose someone learn recently history like NAZI Germany? You say its not what history teaches us, and so I tell you I am getting information from the people there. The primary source. And you have issue with it. You would rather hear it from someone who wasn't there because it fits with a narrative you agree with. I do enjoy a good debate.