there's no need to question Q, if you've read all the drops & have been paying attention. We have no doubt. So why spend time on something that we already know...
There is many reasons to have that discussion. To say otherwise and infer its pointless is asking one to believe in blind faith blindly. Very valid question, is this movement real? Is it benevolent. Should be discussed in great detail actually.
On the other side of Q is something wonderful. You are incorrect about Q. Faith and knowledge is everything about Q. Would you like to know who or what Q is, in the most 99% possible theory?
there's no need to question Q, if you've read all the drops & have been paying attention. We have no doubt. So why spend time on something that we already know...
There is many reasons to have that discussion. To say otherwise and infer its pointless is asking one to believe in blind faith blindly. Very valid question, is this movement real? Is it benevolent. Should be discussed in great detail actually.
On the other side of Q is something wonderful. You are incorrect about Q. Faith and knowledge is everything about Q. Would you like to know who or what Q is, in the most 99% possible theory?
You didn’t read my theory did you?
I’ll spare you the long-winded version.
Q, according to Brent, is Jesus in computer form.