As soon as vaccine was added to the blood, it started losing its right red color indicating it was losing its ability to hold oxygen.
I bought a pulse oximeter recently as I'd read that blood oxygen levels are a great measure of your overall health. I'm double vaxxed (Pfizer) since April and haven't noticed any drop in my oxygen levels, which are around 96-97% consistently.
I had a 'bad day' right after dose 2, which tells me I didn't get saline.
I'm much more interested in the blood clots. Not sure how to watch out for those, other than by falling over!
So from everything I am reading and hearing from actual Doctors and Scientists who have first hand experience with the Covid and understand the vaccines, there are 6 broad categories of problems:
If the vaxxine hits the bloodstream there is a very high chance of clot related severe problems - strokes, heart-attack etc. This usually happens withina few weeks of taking the vaxx and affects both mRNA (Pfizer, moderna) and Adenovirus ones (AZ and J&J)
Most people are safe from (1). You then have the issue of the spike proteins getting into bloodstream slowly. This will be same as (1) but much slower progression. You can catch this with D-Dimer test and if you see too much clotting you can be put on blood-thinners. I know at least two people who have been put on blood thinners after developing clots after vaccines - even though one doctor vehemently deny the causation.
ADE - this is medium term. Makes you susceptible to infections when the next flu season hits. You also end up losing your previous immunity to certain diseases like shingles etc. So you may see resurgance of these diseases very soon. The more times you catch covid the stronger will be the adverse effect. In animal tests, all animals supposedly died when exposed to the virus after vaccinated. I do not believe there is any test for this. But you are highly recommended to take prophylactic vitamins - Zelenko protocol tells you the best combination
AIDS progression - new data is showing that after the first 2 months the effectiveness reduces and then keeps reducing beyond the initial levels. In 40+ age group, it seems like people will lose their full immunity in 16-24 months. This has always been the problem with any Corona virus vaccines historically, and hence we never had a vaccine so far. You can check for this with a full immunoglobin panel tests.
Long term effects - no one has a clue what these would be.
Effects due to contaminants - again no one has a clue what these would be. But plenty of different kinds of contaminants have been reported.
I have a 'random thought' about 'contaminants'. Not arguing with your last point, just a thought. There's a requirement, in vaccines as well as in just about all medical practices, for 'purity'. This 'purity' is expressed in various ways, but 'parts per million' is one that comes to mind (it's not '100% purity' - some contamination is expected and allowed). So the 'raw ingredients' of the vax have to meet these criteria, and if they don't, the batch is typically destroyed. Now, I don't know what these exact criteria are, but let's just say - 'x' parts per million. If you test the product, and find contaminants that don't exceed 'x', you are good to go.
So as alarming as it may sound that some 'tester' somewhere finds 'something' in the vaccine, maybe they are just finding those small amounts that are allowed and expected? And as scary as it may look/sound to find some 'weird stuff' in a vaccine, if it's ultra small, maybe it's just not relevant (not big enough to matter). It's kinda like when they test food samples. There's all manner of nasty stuff in our food, but our bodies are well-equipped to deal with this and 100% purity is not even close to being required. Reminds me of the saying about sausages ... you may be better served not knowing exactly how the sausage is made ...
Valid point definitely. I do have a couple of counter points to it.
If we were to believe the accounts by Japanese officials, they could see different colorings in the batches they sent back - some were pink, some white and some dark. I am assuming that whatever the "x part in million" threshold, it is low enough as to not be seen with naked eye. And if the Japanese officials were lying, one would assume that we would have heard from Moderna/Pfizer an counter accusation or atleast an explanation.
Second counter point, assuming that not every single scientist who has conducted examination of vaccines under microscope is doing it wrong, you would not expect them to see these contaminants so easily. I especially trust Richard Fleming due to his extensive background - and even he was finding these contaminants fairly easily. I would say for every dozen nano-lipids he was able to find some contaminant. With "x in a million" standard, I would have expected to see miles and miles (microns and microns?) of uniform nano-lipids with one contaminant.
I bought a pulse oximeter recently as I'd read that blood oxygen levels are a great measure of your overall health. I'm double vaxxed (Pfizer) since April and haven't noticed any drop in my oxygen levels, which are around 96-97% consistently.
I had a 'bad day' right after dose 2, which tells me I didn't get saline.
I'm much more interested in the blood clots. Not sure how to watch out for those, other than by falling over!
So from everything I am reading and hearing from actual Doctors and Scientists who have first hand experience with the Covid and understand the vaccines, there are 6 broad categories of problems:
If the vaxxine hits the bloodstream there is a very high chance of clot related severe problems - strokes, heart-attack etc. This usually happens withina few weeks of taking the vaxx and affects both mRNA (Pfizer, moderna) and Adenovirus ones (AZ and J&J)
Most people are safe from (1). You then have the issue of the spike proteins getting into bloodstream slowly. This will be same as (1) but much slower progression. You can catch this with D-Dimer test and if you see too much clotting you can be put on blood-thinners. I know at least two people who have been put on blood thinners after developing clots after vaccines - even though one doctor vehemently deny the causation.
ADE - this is medium term. Makes you susceptible to infections when the next flu season hits. You also end up losing your previous immunity to certain diseases like shingles etc. So you may see resurgance of these diseases very soon. The more times you catch covid the stronger will be the adverse effect. In animal tests, all animals supposedly died when exposed to the virus after vaccinated. I do not believe there is any test for this. But you are highly recommended to take prophylactic vitamins - Zelenko protocol tells you the best combination
AIDS progression - new data is showing that after the first 2 months the effectiveness reduces and then keeps reducing beyond the initial levels. In 40+ age group, it seems like people will lose their full immunity in 16-24 months. This has always been the problem with any Corona virus vaccines historically, and hence we never had a vaccine so far. You can check for this with a full immunoglobin panel tests.
Long term effects - no one has a clue what these would be.
Effects due to contaminants - again no one has a clue what these would be. But plenty of different kinds of contaminants have been reported.
I have a 'random thought' about 'contaminants'. Not arguing with your last point, just a thought. There's a requirement, in vaccines as well as in just about all medical practices, for 'purity'. This 'purity' is expressed in various ways, but 'parts per million' is one that comes to mind (it's not '100% purity' - some contamination is expected and allowed). So the 'raw ingredients' of the vax have to meet these criteria, and if they don't, the batch is typically destroyed. Now, I don't know what these exact criteria are, but let's just say - 'x' parts per million. If you test the product, and find contaminants that don't exceed 'x', you are good to go.
So as alarming as it may sound that some 'tester' somewhere finds 'something' in the vaccine, maybe they are just finding those small amounts that are allowed and expected? And as scary as it may look/sound to find some 'weird stuff' in a vaccine, if it's ultra small, maybe it's just not relevant (not big enough to matter). It's kinda like when they test food samples. There's all manner of nasty stuff in our food, but our bodies are well-equipped to deal with this and 100% purity is not even close to being required. Reminds me of the saying about sausages ... you may be better served not knowing exactly how the sausage is made ...
Valid point definitely. I do have a couple of counter points to it.
If we were to believe the accounts by Japanese officials, they could see different colorings in the batches they sent back - some were pink, some white and some dark. I am assuming that whatever the "x part in million" threshold, it is low enough as to not be seen with naked eye. And if the Japanese officials were lying, one would assume that we would have heard from Moderna/Pfizer an counter accusation or atleast an explanation.
Second counter point, assuming that not every single scientist who has conducted examination of vaccines under microscope is doing it wrong, you would not expect them to see these contaminants so easily. I especially trust Richard Fleming due to his extensive background - and even he was finding these contaminants fairly easily. I would say for every dozen nano-lipids he was able to find some contaminant. With "x in a million" standard, I would have expected to see miles and miles (microns and microns?) of uniform nano-lipids with one contaminant.