Can you spot the unsafe "vaccine?"
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (22)
sorted by:
Brilliant! You've doubtless saved a few more potential vax victims -- it's a hard thing to do but this meme is clear, simple, and hard-edged enough to push at least some who were considering the vax for whatever reason to choose safety and sanity over the Poison Death Shot.
Nice job.
Another statistical fact which proves the VAERS deaths are not background deaths are the splits between different vaccine brands. If these deaths after getting the clot shot were coincidences, then they would be spread evenly between the different vaccines based on the number of each vaccine given. However, that is not the case. The J&J vaccine has caused more deaths as a percentage of vaccines given than the Moderna vaccine, which in turn has caused more deaths percentage-wise than the Pfizer vaccine.
All the vaccines are dangerous, but the VAERS data shows that the short term risk varies depending on the vaccine. The long term risk for each vaccine may be inverse to the short term risk for each vaccine, we don't know that yet, but one thing we do know from the data is that these are not background deaths. The true death figure is likely much higher than the VAERS totals.
Are CDC, FDA, USPS, and members of congress still exempt from the clot shot mandate?
And first two still unconstitutional.
Pfizer has no vaccine mandate. Weird.
I blew this up and had it printed on a large poster board for our school board meeting. I also included the adverse side effects. They don’t want to listen, even with the information smacking them in the face.
The phrase, "all the bars would be the same height" isn't wrong per se, but could absolutely be improved upon, OP. It would be much better to rephrase that to say, "same frequency of occurrence" or something along those lines.
But then I wouldn't have understood it.
If, "frequency" is too big of a word for someone, they're pretty fucking stupid, plain and simple.
You represent our entire movement when you make posts like this designed to be shared. I'm not trying to hate on your post by ANY means, I just want to hold you to a high standard so that you represent us well. That means factual data presented in an intelligent yet effective way.
I totally agree with you that informational images like this need to be easily comprehensible but that doesn't mean they have to be completely dumbed down, either. There's certainly a balance, and again I just want to represent the message well. All the best, pede.
That's something you defend in the comment sections of the places you post this at. Don't forget Carlin's words.
Go listen to videos of Trump 25 years ago.
Then listen to any modern interview or speech by him.
It's plainly obvious he's catered his speech patterns to the masses, that he has a large vocabulary but has limited his speech so that it is easy to understand.
That being said, I'm pretty sure the "frequency" you're calling for when discussing the average height of bars would get you scolded by any snobby grammar Nazi.
I'm not disputing that at all, I even got into arguments with people I knew about this during the 2016 primaries. However, Trump's intent is quite different than the intent of sharing hard data. It's two very different contexts.
Maybe show what the data SHOULD look like if there were just random "background" deaths, with no cause linked to the vaccine. Then superimpose / show what it actually DOES look like.
Wow great!! How about a graph of total covid vacinations, covid cases, and covid deaths by month? Oh and add vaccine deaths too.
I've been looking for one showing that the vaccine emergence increased covid cases.