There's something I've been looking into.

I know many say there is graphene in the vials.

I'm not so sure. I'm not sure if they are actually testing it for elemental carbon.

My bet is they are using phosphorene instead.

https://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1131&context=cme_etds

I don't expect you to read the article, so I'll summarize:

Imagine you install an air filter to your house. It catches all the gubbins in the air and stores it on the filter membrane.

What if you could activate the filter to release all it collected all at once?

Months of dust and crap in the air all released simultaneously?

That sounds like a bad time.

Okay, scale it down, and inject it into your body.

What if you could install a membrane on every cell in the body that collects toxins instead of letting the cells dispose of them naturally?

Could you "detonate" the membranes simultaneously and cause a major toxin overload?

This article suggests you can do just that with certain wavelengths of light.

Phosphorene more stable than graphene when it comes to high frequencies?

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/nl5029717

BP devices may offer advantages over graphene transistors for high frequency electronics in terms of voltage and power gain due to the good current saturation properties arising from their finite bandgap, thus can be considered as a promising candidate for the future high performance thin film electronics technology for operation in the multi-GHz frequency range and beyond.

5G connection? Maybe...

If so, it wouldn't be able to work long-distance. Phones themselves would have to be tapped as the "kill switch," but I'm not sure on anything when it comes to 5G. It seems too good to be true, that is if you were a supervillain who wants to hold the world hostage using radio towers...

Meh, it probably wouldn't even take that. If the first article is accurate, they could just pop people with certain light waves anyway, so 5G would only be useful for a mass-casualty events.

5G theories don't have to be real for this phosphorene kill-switch theory to work. So, moving on...

What might prevent you from using phosphorene to control peoples' bodies (kill button)? The ability for cells to naturally remove/process phosphorus?

What happens if you turn that off?

What is anti-phospholipid syndrome? I highly recommend reading this COMPLETELY:

https://www.lupusuk.org.uk/medical/nurses-guide/hughessyndrome/

Symptoms sound familiar?

• Arm vein clots or clotting.
• Kidney vein clots or clotting.
• Colts in eye veins and veins of the brain.
• Leg artery clots/heart attacks etc.
• Recurrent miscarriages due to placental thrombosis.
• Low platelets (occasionally).
• Livedo reticularis (blue/purple lace-like skin pattern or rash.)
• Migraine.
• Antiphospholipid antibodies - Lupus anticoagulant anti-cardiolipin antibodies and anti-β2 glycoprotein 1 antibodies.

The hallmark of the syndrome is the presence of antibodies in the blood known as anti-phospholipid antibodies, which are now standard tests for patients with lupus. The antibodies are extremely closely involved with the risk of thrombosis though still not fully understood. The antibodies are directed against phospholipid, in the membranes of cells (including membranes of platelets) and have been shown to affect clotting as well as flow in blood.

Boy oh boy, does that sound like what the "vaccines" are doing...

My take is this:

The blood clotting wasn't the goal. They actually didn't want people to find out it was dangerous until it was too late. They really only wanted to put the kill code in people, but anti-phospholipid syndrome kicked in first and the cat damn near went supernova when it escaped the bag.

With the end goal of installing phosphorene, they would have a way to deactivate the phosphorene membranes and flood peoples' systems with a lethal dose of toxins. It would look like a virus, but completely controlled by them.

...

If you want to bring Trump into this, I have a theory on that as well.

He is promoting the "vaccines" because they actually overestimated the Cabal's competency in making a "vaccine" that didn't maim people right out the gate. It's possible Trump and Patriots are working on a plan that ensures the Cabal can't activate their kill codes, but never expected them to do such a piss-poor job of developing the "vaccines" such that they don't just kill you.

They can't abandon the plan this far into the game, so he has to continue to push the "vaccines" because to reroute now would take way too much time and probably cost MORE lives than if he just ignored the clot-demic.

I posted this in another post, but I thought it was compelling enough to stand in its own thread.

Thoughts?