This article glows. Not only because the author is a Pulitzer winner.
He talks about how Syed Fahad Hashmi must be completely innocent because all he did was house a guy conspiring to send aid to Al-Qaeda. We now know that Saudi Arabia did a similar thing with the 9/11 bombers due to what was declassified this past September. They paid for the 9/11 hijackers and planners’ apartments.
Furthermore, if Assange is already contemplating suicide in the UK hundreds of times a day, I don’t buy the argument to not extradite him because “he’ll be suicidal in US prisons.” The claim he didn’t show up the second day because he’s “on a lot of medication” is concerning to say the least.
Plus we have this from 1708: “ What if intel masked penetration(s) to frame Russia?
Crowdstrike?
Servers.
SR.
JA.Why does the UK gov desperately want JA?
Think source files.
The more you know.
Q”
I keep leaning toward the conclusion that they don’t want him extradited; he’d be theoretically safe in WH hands, leaving the UK screwed without him. I sometimes wonder if Assange arriving by plane on US soil would be what forces the military to take control, because they know he can’t fall into BH hands. If they have the source files, they can expose it all.
Full tin foil makes me think Assange’s wife is his handler, as she ~happened to know the languages necessary when his legal team was in crunch time for charges against him.~
Not saying the claims that they’re trying to completely destroy the future of whistleblowing are invalid, just that this article reads like someone wrote it with not-so-honest intentions.
I mean is it saying he was innocent me that he didn’t deserve the suspension of rights he got under the “Enemy Combatant” crap?
He looked gaunt and tired. He did not appear in court, the judges explained, because he was receiving a “high dose of medication.”
Assange is being forced BZ. He’s being psychologically tortured. BZ is a chemical agent that basically slowly lobotomizes you into insanity. They’re clearly trying to kill him in prison so they can call it suicide.
After he was observed pacing his cell until he collapsed, punching himself in the face, and banging his head against the wall, he was transferred for several months to the medical wing of the Belmarsh prison. Prison authorities found “half of a razor blade” hidden under his socks. He has repeatedly called the suicide hotline run by the Samaritans because he thought about killing himself “hundreds of times a day.”
No mention of BZ here is MASSIVE GLOW.
Hashmi was deeply religious, and some of his views, including his praise of the Afghan resistance, were controversial, but he had a right to express these sentiments. More importantly, he had a right to expect freedom from persecution and imprisonment because of his opinions, just as Assange should have the freedom, like any publisher, to inform the public about the inner workings of power.
True
Largely this is a good article that makes valid points of how Enemies of the State are treated. It didn’t even go into the reality of Diesel Therapy or the depths of the Chemical Torture being used to destroy Assange.
Make no mistake. If you truly expose the Pentagram you will be tortured and never ever know justice.
I 100% agree that Assange is being tortured and slowly, painfully, killed over in the UK. It’s a crime against humanity. The fact the author in OP’s article argues that he 100% would be treated the same way here strikes me as odd given my understanding of Q and my glimpse of the agreement Assange has in terms of his DMS files.
However, I don’t buy Hashmi being this “good guy” who got a bad deal. I didn’t even know about him until reading OP’s article today. Knowing what I know now about sealed grand jury indictments, intelligence communities/foreign adversaries recruiting and planting people on college campuses, and SA agents funding the 9/11 perpetrators—and living with them, at times—I refuse to blindly accept the “it was just socks!” angle this author is pushing.
As a descendant of a Declaration signer, all of today’s reality makes my blood boil. The treatment of Assange is atrocious. The concerted effort to enslave us all by removing transparency, justice, and liberty enrages me constantly. But this article seems to twist facts to fit a narrative that I’m not sure I support.
I hear you. The author is simply pushing the socks angle as it’s literally what charges the government is claiming.
If anything he was a participant per SA / ISS / MOSSAD / CIA / MI6 who all did 9/11 together and they are keeping him locked up this way to set a precedent.
If he was a threat - they would kill his ass. The entire point is to smear him and establish acceptance for locking someone away for “socks” yes? Then someone like Julian everyone willingly accepts - which is precisely what has happened.
Julian helps the world and the world turns their back and watches the latest Squid Games and forgets.
This is a better example. If JA gets sent to the US he’s going into SAMs
In the case of Abu Hamza, it was argued that his extradition would be oppressive because he would likely be held under SAMs, despite severe health issues, including that he is missing both hands.
US prosecutors guaranteed that this would not be the case stating that if he were, it would only be for a short time.
Once they had their hands on Hamza, they placed him under SAMs in ADX Florence, where he remains to this day.
Because of the contract he’s got, and the fact the UK is arguing against it while torturing him to death in their own prisons. Similar idea to how the democrats accuse Trump of doing everything they’re guilty of committing themselves.
Also because Colin Powell and Grant Woods are in his insurance files.
Both Powell and Woods are now dead. The WHs definitely took care of them.
Snowden is mentioned as a liability; JA is not. JA, strikingly, is not mentioned specifically as a patriot by Q, unlike Seth Rich.
And I’m pretty sure Cicada knows who is in his files. Which is why they want the source files—so the blackmail remains useful.
Assange knows this, so his DMS keeps him alive. Unfortunately, they’re still hell bent on torturing him because of what he has and what he’s managed to do.
This article glows. Not only because the author is a Pulitzer winner.
He talks about how Syed Fahad Hashmi must be completely innocent because all he did was house a guy conspiring to send aid to Al-Qaeda. We now know that Saudi Arabia did a similar thing with the 9/11 bombers due to what was declassified this past September. They paid for the 9/11 hijackers and planners’ apartments.
Furthermore, if Assange is already contemplating suicide in the UK hundreds of times a day, I don’t buy the argument to not extradite him because “he’ll be suicidal in US prisons.” The claim he didn’t show up the second day because he’s “on a lot of medication” is concerning to say the least.
Plus we have this from 1708: “ What if intel masked penetration(s) to frame Russia? Crowdstrike? Servers. SR. JA. Why does the UK gov desperately want JA? Think source files. The more you know. Q”
I keep leaning toward the conclusion that they don’t want him extradited; he’d be theoretically safe in WH hands, leaving the UK screwed without him. I sometimes wonder if Assange arriving by plane on US soil would be what forces the military to take control, because they know he can’t fall into BH hands. If they have the source files, they can expose it all.
Full tin foil makes me think Assange’s wife is his handler, as she ~happened to know the languages necessary when his legal team was in crunch time for charges against him.~
Not saying the claims that they’re trying to completely destroy the future of whistleblowing are invalid, just that this article reads like someone wrote it with not-so-honest intentions.
I mean is it saying he was innocent me that he didn’t deserve the suspension of rights he got under the “Enemy Combatant” crap?
Assange is being forced BZ. He’s being psychologically tortured. BZ is a chemical agent that basically slowly lobotomizes you into insanity. They’re clearly trying to kill him in prison so they can call it suicide.
No mention of BZ here is MASSIVE GLOW.
True
Largely this is a good article that makes valid points of how Enemies of the State are treated. It didn’t even go into the reality of Diesel Therapy or the depths of the Chemical Torture being used to destroy Assange.
Make no mistake. If you truly expose the Pentagram you will be tortured and never ever know justice.
THIS IS DONE IN THE NAME OF THE UNITED STATES
Our Forefathers would be HORRIFIED
I 100% agree that Assange is being tortured and slowly, painfully, killed over in the UK. It’s a crime against humanity. The fact the author in OP’s article argues that he 100% would be treated the same way here strikes me as odd given my understanding of Q and my glimpse of the agreement Assange has in terms of his DMS files.
However, I don’t buy Hashmi being this “good guy” who got a bad deal. I didn’t even know about him until reading OP’s article today. Knowing what I know now about sealed grand jury indictments, intelligence communities/foreign adversaries recruiting and planting people on college campuses, and SA agents funding the 9/11 perpetrators—and living with them, at times—I refuse to blindly accept the “it was just socks!” angle this author is pushing.
As a descendant of a Declaration signer, all of today’s reality makes my blood boil. The treatment of Assange is atrocious. The concerted effort to enslave us all by removing transparency, justice, and liberty enrages me constantly. But this article seems to twist facts to fit a narrative that I’m not sure I support.
I hear you. The author is simply pushing the socks angle as it’s literally what charges the government is claiming.
If anything he was a participant per SA / ISS / MOSSAD / CIA / MI6 who all did 9/11 together and they are keeping him locked up this way to set a precedent.
If he was a threat - they would kill his ass. The entire point is to smear him and establish acceptance for locking someone away for “socks” yes? Then someone like Julian everyone willingly accepts - which is precisely what has happened.
Julian helps the world and the world turns their back and watches the latest Squid Games and forgets.
This is a better example. If JA gets sent to the US he’s going into SAMs
In the case of Abu Hamza, it was argued that his extradition would be oppressive because he would likely be held under SAMs, despite severe health issues, including that he is missing both hands. US prosecutors guaranteed that this would not be the case stating that if he were, it would only be for a short time. Once they had their hands on Hamza, they placed him under SAMs in ADX Florence, where he remains to this day.
This article doesn’t glow. It’s a good summary of what’s going on and what’s at stake.
What makes you think he would be in WH hands if he gets sent to the US?
Because of the contract he’s got, and the fact the UK is arguing against it while torturing him to death in their own prisons. Similar idea to how the democrats accuse Trump of doing everything they’re guilty of committing themselves.
Also because Colin Powell and Grant Woods are in his insurance files.
Both Powell and Woods are now dead. The WHs definitely took care of them.
Snowden is mentioned as a liability; JA is not. JA, strikingly, is not mentioned specifically as a patriot by Q, unlike Seth Rich.
Much of my thinking revolving JA stems from this thread and those like that from around that time.
WH aren’t the ones in court right now. If he gets sent to the US he’s going to get thrown in SAMS/ADX and probably killed.
Unlike Isaac Kappy, his DMS is real
And I’m pretty sure Cicada knows who is in his files. Which is why they want the source files—so the blackmail remains useful.
Assange knows this, so his DMS keeps him alive. Unfortunately, they’re still hell bent on torturing him because of what he has and what he’s managed to do.
Excellent comment. Moar of this.
Thanks, cats!