I often hear from misinformed people, that Julian Assange & Wikileaks somehow endangered the lives of our men and women in uniform with their release of war documents.
But Here is the truth:
In July 2010, when WikiLeaks began revealing secret documents about the war in Afghanistan, the Pentagon immediately accused him and his organization of having blood on their hands, because their publication would put Afghan translators and informants at risk, those who collaborated with American and Western coalition troops.
The Pentagon and the CIA created large task forces of intelligence analysts to sift through every single name that came out of those documents to try to find out if any of them had been killed or injured or imprisoned due to the release of those documents' names.
The Pentagon task force used as many as 100 intelligence experts for this.
11 years have passed, and not a single example of a person killed, injured or imprisoned has been discovered.
Wikileaks, has harmed 0 people. They revealed the Government lying to you directly about a war they had no intention of winning, and put a real face on the elite class of criminals that make up that ruling power; who were laundering your money through massive defense contracts into their own pockets.
That power is now seeking to steal your free speech by virtue of using their corrupt case against Assange.
Make no mistake, your rights are on trial.
If the US Government is able to game the British court system, despite their huge list of crimes committed along the way, we all stand to lose; and find ourselves imprisoned as well.
There has never been a better moment, to speak up, to speak out, and to fight against this injustice.
Not just for the sake of an innocent publisher, but for the sake of our very freedom and future.
Agreed about the Pentagon/Iraq situation, Vault 7, and especially the Pizzagate/Stratfor leaks.
I also agree to a certain extent, though, with what Sucka is saying. Not about the law part; Fahrenheit 451 is the largest example I have of needing to break laws in authoritarian states. And as you said, no one in uniform has been harmed by what was shared on WL.
However, Q’s drop about how information is shared with WL makes me curious what Assange’s intentions have been at times, especially if he is the rumored Triple Dipper.
Seth Rich stands out to me. Partially because I think people like Isaac Kappy and Seth Rich were actively trying to bring these evils to light, but because they didn’t know how to “play the game” like Assange, he got the info, and they got murdered. That does feel a little like extortion/rubs me the wrong way.
As I cannot see the chess board from where Assange is sitting, I can’t say for sure why he chose to withhold some information and share other pieces of the puzzle. My emotional reasoning asks why he couldn’t share everything to keep those people alive; my logical reasoning says there was more to the story and war begets casualties.
I often hear from misinformed people, that Julian Assange & Wikileaks somehow endangered the lives of our men and women in uniform with their release of war documents.
But Here is the truth:
In July 2010, when WikiLeaks began revealing secret documents about the war in Afghanistan, the Pentagon immediately accused him and his organization of having blood on their hands, because their publication would put Afghan translators and informants at risk, those who collaborated with American and Western coalition troops.
The Pentagon and the CIA created large task forces of intelligence analysts to sift through every single name that came out of those documents to try to find out if any of them had been killed or injured or imprisoned due to the release of those documents' names.
The Pentagon task force used as many as 100 intelligence experts for this.
11 years have passed, and not a single example of a person killed, injured or imprisoned has been discovered.
Wikileaks, has harmed 0 people. They revealed the Government lying to you directly about a war they had no intention of winning, and put a real face on the elite class of criminals that make up that ruling power; who were laundering your money through massive defense contracts into their own pockets.
That power is now seeking to steal your free speech by virtue of using their corrupt case against Assange.
Make no mistake, your rights are on trial. If the US Government is able to game the British court system, despite their huge list of crimes committed along the way, we all stand to lose; and find ourselves imprisoned as well.
There has never been a better moment, to speak up, to speak out, and to fight against this injustice.
Not just for the sake of an innocent publisher, but for the sake of our very freedom and future.
At the end of this, you are their target.
Agreed about the Pentagon/Iraq situation, Vault 7, and especially the Pizzagate/Stratfor leaks.
I also agree to a certain extent, though, with what Sucka is saying. Not about the law part; Fahrenheit 451 is the largest example I have of needing to break laws in authoritarian states. And as you said, no one in uniform has been harmed by what was shared on WL.
However, Q’s drop about how information is shared with WL makes me curious what Assange’s intentions have been at times, especially if he is the rumored Triple Dipper.
Seth Rich stands out to me. Partially because I think people like Isaac Kappy and Seth Rich were actively trying to bring these evils to light, but because they didn’t know how to “play the game” like Assange, he got the info, and they got murdered. That does feel a little like extortion/rubs me the wrong way.
As I cannot see the chess board from where Assange is sitting, I can’t say for sure why he chose to withhold some information and share other pieces of the puzzle. My emotional reasoning asks why he couldn’t share everything to keep those people alive; my logical reasoning says there was more to the story and war begets casualties.