Similar story with my daughters (now grown up). They did not get all the vaccines they were supposed to get. They almost never got sick as children. And when it happened, it usually lasted 24h. It was a very rare event and they were going to school, most other children were having colds and various issues chronically.
There's a lot of meat in this. It is important to note that the study was done after they noted all these bad changes in people who had had the infection, and then they discovered their vaccine, which was not an mRNA vaccine but the traditional inactivated type, caused almost exactly the same changes. So, we don't know about damage caused by graphene or other excipients in any of these vaccines, but we do know that the spike protein is the common factor. That makes the mRNA and J&J vaccines all the more of a stupid idea, because they are making more of the spike protein.
Very good points. Also, the study size was very small despite the detail in analyzing the results. Lots of really good information in their analysis. As you stated, the vaxxine results mimic what was noted with the original infection which confirms your assessment. This would make sense because of the more traditional vaccine technology they used. Unfortunately for us, the DNA and mRNA inoculations used here in the West are creating a whole host of symptomology not actually related to whatever they were calling infection with SARS-CoV-2 last year. Whatever people are being affected with now is a direct result of the clot shots and not some organically grown infection process.
Results indicated that vaccination, in addition to stimulating the generation of neutralizing antibodies, also influenced various health indicators including those related to diabetes, renal dysfunction, cholesterol metabolism, coagulation problems, electrolyte imbalance, in a way as if the volunteers experienced an infection.
Vaccination also increased classical monocyte contents. Moreover, the gene set positively contributing to MVS scores, also known to be associated with severe symptom development, was highly expressed in monocytes. Type I interferon (IFN-α/β) responses, supposedly beneficial against COVID-19, were downregulated after vaccination. In addition, the negative MVS genes were highly expressed in lymphocytes (T, B, and NK cells), yet showed reduced expression after vaccination.
Together, these data suggested that after vaccination, at least by day 28, other than generation of neutralizing antibodies, people’s immune systems, including those of lymphocytes and monocytes, were perhaps in a more vulnerable state.
Interestingly:
It is worth mentioning that one individual in cohort A who was on antibiotics, happened to not having reduced gene expression linked to type I interferon responses, and this individual also had the highest neutralizing antibody titer within the cohort.
Similar story with my daughters (now grown up). They did not get all the vaccines they were supposed to get. They almost never got sick as children. And when it happened, it usually lasted 24h. It was a very rare event and they were going to school, most other children were having colds and various issues chronically.
There's a lot of meat in this. It is important to note that the study was done after they noted all these bad changes in people who had had the infection, and then they discovered their vaccine, which was not an mRNA vaccine but the traditional inactivated type, caused almost exactly the same changes. So, we don't know about damage caused by graphene or other excipients in any of these vaccines, but we do know that the spike protein is the common factor. That makes the mRNA and J&J vaccines all the more of a stupid idea, because they are making more of the spike protein.
Very good points. Also, the study size was very small despite the detail in analyzing the results. Lots of really good information in their analysis. As you stated, the vaxxine results mimic what was noted with the original infection which confirms your assessment. This would make sense because of the more traditional vaccine technology they used. Unfortunately for us, the DNA and mRNA inoculations used here in the West are creating a whole host of symptomology not actually related to whatever they were calling infection with SARS-CoV-2 last year. Whatever people are being affected with now is a direct result of the clot shots and not some organically grown infection process.
Wow, that's comprehensive. A few findings:
Interestingly:
I believe that this is the Chinese vaxx, which uses inactivated virus. What can you say? The spike protein is toxic.
Likely permanent.
All authors are Chinese. Beware!!!
That explains the strange engrish grammar.
So in the truest sense, the vaccine is the virus.