The vaxed have disappearing immune systems.
(www.bitchute.com)
Comments (34)
sorted by:
Here’s what gets me —my unvaxxed family is hosting the rest who are vaxxed for Christmas—that’s about 25-30 people. With their compromised immune systems, what could go wrong. I’m a planner with a wait and see attitude but if what she’s saying is true, it could be really awful.
Prepare for awful.
Prepare for awful. Keep a close eye on friends and relatives.
However, the fear mongering on both sides of the vax is astounding. So far the vaccines appears to be roughly as dangerous as covid. Which means not that dangerous.
Order ivermectin, zinc, vitamin C & D in quantities large enough to support all your loved ones.
The vax is very dangerous for the elderly that weren't killed by it immediately. It gets them later by preventing their innate immune system from functioning properly, which was weak to begin with.
Difference is though that with the virus there are effective therapeutics and ways to reduce the chances that you get it/get very ill if you do. With the vaxx it's a game of Russian Roulette. My decision not to get vaxxed has nothing to do with potential side effects but I can certainly understand why many are more fearful of that potential than they are of getting the virus
Personally, I'd choose a bullet before the vax. But if I critically look at all the data, it's not that dangerous. Over time I believe that will change.
Of course ivermectin or hcq is the smart choice. But who ever accused normies of being smart?
Red Christmas.
Four variants of vaccination per company. Weakest variant given to the first group to entice larger uptake. Although I have no opinion on the 5%, I believe as winter progresses we will be in a heap of trouble. I do believe it compromises our immune systems. Time will tell, that is for sure. Better to be safe than sorry.
Who is this person?
Dr. Tenpenny
Dr. Sherry Tenpenny. Well respected and has been speaking out about covid and the vaxx the entire time. Look her up. She does an excellent job of explaining the “real science”!
When you take the time to actually watch and listen to the video, you will find the first sentence out of her mouth is literally stating her source. Let me know if you need me to Google it for you.
Transcribed, you say?
What is the very first sentence that you transcribed? It should be easy to copy and paste here.
So, you didn't transcribe it. Because had you, a copy/paste job from the first sentence gets you to the source by literally adding two words. That's why you didn't provide it. That's why you shifted this to me like I'm the asshole here. lol
I recommend that you take the time to actually go over the content first before commenting in threads moving forward. If you do, you won't leave comments opening yourself up to public ridicule.
what did i say that could possibly lead you to either question/conclusion? lol
That. That is your original request, which she states in her first sentence.
Take the L and have a great day.
What a jerk, I suppose you are the same type of person that would criticize him for using Google in the first place.
In the amount of time it took you to write your comment, you could've provided the source, and helped educate someone.
What a pig.
u/anonleo1579 - here's the sources:
The Expose article - Good breakdown of the data.
The UK Gov weekly reports - You want to reference Week 41 - October 14th
This is also referenced in The Expose article.
You're right. I could have. I didn't. I'm glad you demonstrated how easy it was and how lazy of a question u/anonleo1579 presented. :) Have a great day!
Fact Check:
Your argument has been proven fake & gay.