Oh don't worry, big pharma will send the cleanup crew in to neutralize the whistleblower within the week. He/she won't escape the consequences of outing their fake studies and fake evidence for getting this population control shot into every man woman and child pin the planet. Whistleblower should have read the employment contact as I'm pretty sure they write the "you agree to swift neutralization if you are found to be blowing any whistles (physical out metaphorical)" clause directly into the employment agreement.
Oh wait, you meant when does big pharma get consequences. Well short answer is it doesn't. Long answer is big pharma will create a shell Corp with minimal assets and will assign to it the patents, the management (via subcontract) and/or the liabilities for the poison vaccines and the drug trials for the FDA approvals. Thus they will let the lawsuit go against said shell company so everyone can sue it and obtain pyrrhic victory while the pharmaceutical company will continue on without issue. The FDA drug approval group knows full well to not review the data from the trials in too much detail when the drug is from one of the major 3 pharmaceutical companies.
In my opinion, if the drug is from a smaller company, then the review process is much more detailed and intentionally designed to put up roadblocks and slow walk approval. That way the big three pharmaceuticals will have more time and leverage to propose buying out the small company at minimal cost and/or buying out the patents underlying if they just want only the one drug.
Hopefully this time it goes drastically differently and we can break up these companies, and put the execs and board on trial on down to the scientists who falsified data.
Oh don't worry, big pharma will send the cleanup crew in to neutralize the whistleblower within the week. He/she won't escape the consequences of outing their fake studies and fake evidence for getting this population control shot into every man woman and child pin the planet. Whistleblower should have read the employment contact as I'm pretty sure they write the "you agree to swift neutralization if you are found to be blowing any whistles (physical out metaphorical)" clause directly into the employment agreement.
Oh wait, you meant when does big pharma get consequences. Well short answer is it doesn't. Long answer is big pharma will create a shell Corp with minimal assets and will assign to it the patents, the management (via subcontract) and/or the liabilities for the poison vaccines and the drug trials for the FDA approvals. Thus they will let the lawsuit go against said shell company so everyone can sue it and obtain pyrrhic victory while the pharmaceutical company will continue on without issue. The FDA drug approval group knows full well to not review the data from the trials in too much detail when the drug is from one of the major 3 pharmaceutical companies.
In my opinion, if the drug is from a smaller company, then the review process is much more detailed and intentionally designed to put up roadblocks and slow walk approval. That way the big three pharmaceuticals will have more time and leverage to propose buying out the small company at minimal cost and/or buying out the patents underlying if they just want only the one drug.
Hopefully this time it goes drastically differently and we can break up these companies, and put the execs and board on trial on down to the scientists who falsified data.
RIP Jeff Bradstreet
I know. The imo was in there to prevent any legal jeopardy.
At least you're optimistic about it all :)
Did you read the article?