Idk I personally think a lot of posts are a huge stretch. When you look for a link you always find something even if it isn't really there because that's how the brain works. If this is true it is one of the most impressive I have seen in awhile, but I tend to think one of the following is going on:
1: Many markers happened but not publicly. We don't understand literally half of Q posts cause it is operational comms. Hillary may have been arrested the exact date Q said and it was kept hush.
2: Parts of the plan fell through and were improvised so timeliness shifted or they never happened at all.
We know lots of big things happened that were never mentioned by Q, we know most of what happens will not be public, we know disinformation is a huge part too. We also know double meanings exist. Really all of that info tells us we have no clue what is real and what isn't.
Think logically if this is a war and we can find deltas on here you don't think the enemy sees them too? I truly don't believe there are any deltas past a year. Qs original deltas were typically with weeks if I remember correctly. Did Q ever say a delta could be 4 or 10 years?
Fair enough, and respectfully, intelligently said. Can't fault you for the viewpoint.
BUT, how many coincidences before statistically impossible? I'm not sure, I'm more a liberal arts guy and I love myself a good puff of the occasional Hopium. π
Am also a hopium-hopeful. When the ropes are a swingin' i'll be in the streets singin'. I f***ing hate movies. Tell me the ending first and Ill participate in the plot. Fuck you FBI, CIA, Fags.
You could be right that we see certain things because weβre looking for them but as we look there are a lot of coincidences that weirdly line up. Maybe some of them are actually the bad people trying to string us along, like the Red October thing with Alec Baldwin, who knows? More than anything itβs just fun to speculate.
yeah, the timing on that was really incredible. whoever negligently or deliberately loaded a live round into the gun that Baldwin would have in his hand to run through that scene might have done so at any other time in filming, but it happened smack in the middle of October. Filmmakers stage and rehearse and film and reshoot and film from different angles and do close ups of the same scene until the director feels they have sufficiently captured the story the scene is meant to tell... but this 'happened' to happen in October.
But did Q know someone was going to try to destroy Baldwin or use him to accidentally kill the filmmaker wife of an attorney that had turned/ might turn states evidence? Or that the filmmaker was facing death threats? Would that mean that Q & White Hats would have possession of whatever evidence that made her a threat to the DS or cabal players...
Curiouser and curiouser.
I agree. I said something somewhat similar. That we'll have no clue how to decode the posts until after the fact, and even then Q might have to explain it to us.
Idk I personally think a lot of posts are a huge stretch. When you look for a link you always find something even if it isn't really there because that's how the brain works. If this is true it is one of the most impressive I have seen in awhile, but I tend to think one of the following is going on:
1: Many markers happened but not publicly. We don't understand literally half of Q posts cause it is operational comms. Hillary may have been arrested the exact date Q said and it was kept hush.
2: Parts of the plan fell through and were improvised so timeliness shifted or they never happened at all.
We know lots of big things happened that were never mentioned by Q, we know most of what happens will not be public, we know disinformation is a huge part too. We also know double meanings exist. Really all of that info tells us we have no clue what is real and what isn't.
Think logically if this is a war and we can find deltas on here you don't think the enemy sees them too? I truly don't believe there are any deltas past a year. Qs original deltas were typically with weeks if I remember correctly. Did Q ever say a delta could be 4 or 10 years?
Fair enough, and respectfully, intelligently said. Can't fault you for the viewpoint.
BUT, how many coincidences before statistically impossible? I'm not sure, I'm more a liberal arts guy and I love myself a good puff of the occasional Hopium. π
Am also a hopium-hopeful. When the ropes are a swingin' i'll be in the streets singin'. I f***ing hate movies. Tell me the ending first and Ill participate in the plot. Fuck you FBI, CIA, Fags.
You could be right that we see certain things because weβre looking for them but as we look there are a lot of coincidences that weirdly line up. Maybe some of them are actually the bad people trying to string us along, like the Red October thing with Alec Baldwin, who knows? More than anything itβs just fun to speculate.
yeah, the timing on that was really incredible. whoever negligently or deliberately loaded a live round into the gun that Baldwin would have in his hand to run through that scene might have done so at any other time in filming, but it happened smack in the middle of October. Filmmakers stage and rehearse and film and reshoot and film from different angles and do close ups of the same scene until the director feels they have sufficiently captured the story the scene is meant to tell... but this 'happened' to happen in October.
But did Q know someone was going to try to destroy Baldwin or use him to accidentally kill the filmmaker wife of an attorney that had turned/ might turn states evidence? Or that the filmmaker was facing death threats? Would that mean that Q & White Hats would have possession of whatever evidence that made her a threat to the DS or cabal players...
Curiouser and curiouser.
I agree. I said something somewhat similar. That we'll have no clue how to decode the posts until after the fact, and even then Q might have to explain it to us.