Q saying JFK Jr is dead doesn't necessarily mean he is dead.
Deepstate and everyone else thinks he's dead.
If he is alive, no WAY is Q going to blow the perfect cover by admitting the fact. He can operate under the radar and assist the Q team in any number of ways, with completely plausible deniability.
So, Q MUST say JFK Jr. is dead, if either of the following is true:
Agree.
Q also said that disinfo was necessary.
RFK Jr got pretty emo in an interview when they asked him about it. He refused to answer, just kinda looked startled.
I don't have an opinion about JFK Jr, just like I don't have a 100% opinion re: Michelle?Michael?Obama. I remain willing to be surprised. But I got a busy life and more important stuff to form opinions about.
No one said Q "must" answer a given question; the very notion is absurd on its face. How would anyone enforce such a "requirement" on him, when his whereabouts and identity are unknown? Silly.
If he chooses to answer the question at all and state alive or dead...which he DID choose to do... he must say JFK is dead. It means he won't say he's alive, even if that's the case.
Q specifically didn’t want anons chasing it. I’m sorry I’m smug and this upsets you but hear me out.
Q didn’t bring ‘jr is alive’ to the table, anons did, Q choose to answer no instead of ignoring it for a reason.
Is it disinformation? Well what’s the point, whats being gained?
To throw off the cabal? To be coy or sneaky?
The most reasonable answer, is that Q told anons no because it was being used to slide threads at that time, and still is, it’s also been used, very successfully, to make anons look crazy stupid, trying to discredit Q.
If Q didn’t answer no, there would be even more of you. There’s no other gain, than to stop the distractions, and disarm the enemy.
The enemy attacks you with theories pushed by telegram, Twitter, and Facebook. Where disinformation warfare is waged against you. No ones using the proofs to attack anons, they’re using underground tunnel babies and jr theories from telegram and Facebook etc
If this is not reasonable enough logic for you, we can get into those sketchy telegrams pushing the jr shit
Why would you want to spend any time, or subscribe to a belief, that directly contradicts what Q told you, all while it’s being used against you? Q has already told you who, and what to focus on.
If jr is alive, cool, amazing, stunned, until you see him come forward as himself, you should run with what Q told you, he’s not alive.
Why would you want to spend any time, or subscribe to a belief, that directly contradicts what Q told you, all while it’s being used against you?
More to the point, why would you assume that you can read my mind and tell what beliefs I subscribe to, without my revealing them? I never once stated a belief in JFK Jr. being either alive or dead, since I don't have one. All I did was share airtight logic as to why he isn't ever going to say he's alive.
ONCE AGAIN
Q saying JFK Jr is dead doesn't necessarily mean he is dead.
Deepstate and everyone else thinks he's dead.
If he is alive, no WAY is Q going to blow the perfect cover by admitting the fact. He can operate under the radar and assist the Q team in any number of ways, with completely plausible deniability.
So, Q MUST say JFK Jr. is dead, if either of the following is true:
JFK Jr. is alive.
JFK Jr. is dead.
Agree. Q also said that disinfo was necessary. RFK Jr got pretty emo in an interview when they asked him about it. He refused to answer, just kinda looked startled. I don't have an opinion about JFK Jr, just like I don't have a 100% opinion re: Michelle?Michael?Obama. I remain willing to be surprised. But I got a busy life and more important stuff to form opinions about.
Here's a couple of before/after photos of JohnJohn and Carolyn. I.e, before death and now.
https://files.catbox.moe/hsuvhb.jpg
Allegedly.
Why do you think Q “ must say “ ?
Considering Q ignored other questions during the q&a why do you take the side that Q “must” answer?
Q never said jr was alive it was a hypothetical
Q didn’t have to say anything, Q chose to say no, just like your choosing to not believe it
Q never told you to focus on jfk, chans never said focus on jfk, so why are people persistent in it?
First 2 questions are nonsensical
No one said Q "must" answer a given question; the very notion is absurd on its face. How would anyone enforce such a "requirement" on him, when his whereabouts and identity are unknown? Silly.
If he chooses to answer the question at all and state alive or dead...which he DID choose to do... he must say JFK is dead. It means he won't say he's alive, even if that's the case.
Q specifically didn’t want anons chasing it. I’m sorry I’m smug and this upsets you but hear me out.
Q didn’t bring ‘jr is alive’ to the table, anons did, Q choose to answer no instead of ignoring it for a reason.
Is it disinformation? Well what’s the point, whats being gained?
To throw off the cabal? To be coy or sneaky?
The most reasonable answer, is that Q told anons no because it was being used to slide threads at that time, and still is, it’s also been used, very successfully, to make anons look crazy stupid, trying to discredit Q.
If Q didn’t answer no, there would be even more of you. There’s no other gain, than to stop the distractions, and disarm the enemy.
The enemy attacks you with theories pushed by telegram, Twitter, and Facebook. Where disinformation warfare is waged against you. No ones using the proofs to attack anons, they’re using underground tunnel babies and jr theories from telegram and Facebook etc
If this is not reasonable enough logic for you, we can get into those sketchy telegrams pushing the jr shit
Why would you want to spend any time, or subscribe to a belief, that directly contradicts what Q told you, all while it’s being used against you? Q has already told you who, and what to focus on.
If jr is alive, cool, amazing, stunned, until you see him come forward as himself, you should run with what Q told you, he’s not alive.
More to the point, why would you assume that you can read my mind and tell what beliefs I subscribe to, without my revealing them? I never once stated a belief in JFK Jr. being either alive or dead, since I don't have one. All I did was share airtight logic as to why he isn't ever going to say he's alive.
Also JFK jr. is no longer jr. once Sr. has deceased. A technicality yes, but true also
Not true.