Okay. We have established there are multiple pictures of Durham to choose from. If they "seem fake", the burden lies upon you to prove they are fake. They've always been there.
If that's not enough for you, here is the New York Times captioning a picture, from his swearing in back in 2018, in an article from this year.
The burden of proof is literally on you and your feelings, fren. May the odds be forever in your favor.
Multiple. Less than one handful. The burden of proof on me is just as big of a burden on you. I didn't claim the photos were fake. They just seem suspect. The same way every other MSM interview looks like green screen CGI garbage.
Durham is an elusive enigma. He's indicting now and these characters now have to show up in a specific location for court yet a photo or video of Durham hasn't been captured by anyone. Like the loch Ness monster.
You haven't looked very hard. I googled images of Durham and found 7 or 8 different ones very quickly.
They seem fake. Also, he was the DA of Connecticut for a few years too starting in 2018. Why nothing from those days?
Listen, I'm on board with everything but I still continue to speculate and question because confirmation is a good thing!
Let me make this very easy for you then:
Okay. We have established there are multiple pictures of Durham to choose from. If they "seem fake", the burden lies upon you to prove they are fake. They've always been there.
If that's not enough for you, here is the New York Times captioning a picture, from his swearing in back in 2018, in an article from this year.
The burden of proof is literally on you and your feelings, fren. May the odds be forever in your favor.
Multiple. Less than one handful. The burden of proof on me is just as big of a burden on you. I didn't claim the photos were fake. They just seem suspect. The same way every other MSM interview looks like green screen CGI garbage.
Durham is an elusive enigma. He's indicting now and these characters now have to show up in a specific location for court yet a photo or video of Durham hasn't been captured by anyone. Like the loch Ness monster.
Okay. They seem real to me.
/discussion
It won't confirm itself. If you want to confirm it, do the research. You have to go where the information is located.
I've done the research and same as you I haven't found Jack diddle beyond the handful of pics we've all seen Durham had somehow avoided all press.
There are lots of photos. Just google it. I did and found 8 or 10 unique photos in the first page of results.
Name checks out.
& that's about it. & maybe 2 since this investigation began?