Poor Big Bird...Ruffled his feathers...
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (53)
sorted by:
Okay. Well I don't understand why you would run away with assumptions.
Personally I find that to be a dangerous way to operate, but that's on you. How about I come back in a couple months, and if there is any significant increase in giraffe death, or any animal death at captive zoo animals, I'll give you $1,000.
Otherwise, you can give me $50.
Deal?
Let's just watch the developments? It's all good man, but I haven't even read today's stickies with all this girraffocity. 😎 ☕️
No, I'd be really interested in betting money on this.
I'm pretty confident that the giraffes were not vaccinated, because if they were, we'd see more giraffes go down across multiple zoos, not just this isolated case. We'd also see other animals being affected.
You seem extremely confident in your stance, so this should be easy money for you.
I'll even better the odds. If I lose, you get $1,500, but that's as high as I'll go. If I win, you pay $50
My nephew Alex loves to play devils advocate with me. I told him my name on GAw but he didn't tell me his. IS THIS YOU ALEX?!!! 😂
Nope, fraid not
Do you believe a zoo's veterinarian will ADMIT IT? How do you suppose "proof" will be obtained? Them filming the jab and posting it? I'm not betting THAT will happen...ESPECIALLY NOW that "anti-jab conspiracy theorists" are watching.
I know it is. That's why I read through each of the links, nonne of which can provide a link between animal deaths and vaccines.
Vets have admitted that they've vaxxed other animals. How come none of those animals are dying, and only animals that they report as not yet being vaxxed?
Yes, I do. Considering they released articles previously stating they would vaccinate other animals, I don't understand why they would omit that they would vaccinate giraffes.
Proof would be obtained by them at least stating that the giraffes had gotten the shot, which they hadn't. For me, proof would also apply if they found a cause of death that wasn't linked to the vax, but that might not be enough for you, and I understand that.
Regardless, you've posted articles detailing their plans for vaccinating (primarily, to primates, felines, and canids). The animals so far that have died in the "rumor mill news" article you posted are none of these (elephants, giraffes, seals, and ostriches). Additionally, there were causes of death listed for each one and they varied (mass on lungs, C-section, etc)
So then why assume that the animals were vaxxed if the information is pending? Isn’t that illogical to assume that conclusion?