Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kenosha_unrest_shooting&action=history
The second is the "Talk" tab where you can see the detailed conversations made about said changes, as seen in the second image.
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kenosha_unrest_shooting
When history is being changed and re-written before your very eyes, it's important to know what is being changed and who is doing the changes. There are a lot of parallels and individuals doing the rewriting across many crucial pages on Wikipedia.
The More You Know
I've read plenty of "Talk" pages where they are actively trying to suppress info.
Wikipedia cant even keep up with their own lies
Doesn't stop them trying though - cuz that's what liars do!
Yeah, except that wpedia has a central arbiter that overwrites it, but the outside world allows parallel narratives to exist at the same time side-by-side.
Wikipedia is part of the digital warfront. Aim set EDIT!
that's fucking interesting
I thought the same thing.
I noticed this for the first time after the whole “He’s telling them to inject bleach” debacle, the very day of the press conference. UV light therapy to be used internally to fight viruses is a thing. Ultraviolet Blood Irradiation Therapy, the information on that wiki was being heavily edited directly following Trumps mention of the therapy. I discovered the history tab and I wasn’t sitting on the fence anymore after that. I knew he was right.
Good to know, thanks.
Shine that light!
Thank you for this info - I will share (with students as well)!
I take Wikipedia with a couple of 50lb bags of salt.
Thats true, but in some sense, wikipedia becomes the "truth" in many peoples eyes. This isn't even even because of Wikipedia itself, but Wikidata: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Main_Page
Which feeds directly or indirectly ever single internet-based service in the world, whether it be big tech, small tech, alt tech, whatever.
The founder has disowned it.
Think how many people reference Wikipedia in a day trying to get facts not realizing how few of them are there. It's basically msnbc transcripts with footnotes in many cases
Yah. The fact that Soros funds BLM evaporated from wiki right after St Fentanyl stunt
I know. I registered and went in to Wikipedia to correct and change a totally biased biographical entry about a young newly-elected representative whom I personally know. (I know the facts and my intent was to present just the facts and take out biased inflammatory language.) I was rather quickly sent a message that my edits would be eliminated. That they were “not to the standard” of Wikipedia, and had been “vetted” by professionals. ZAPPED off like a moth trying to reach the light. I replied that I would spread the word that Wikipedia actually is WOKE and to BE AWARE!
The most important tab is “Early Life”
Yea, She is an amazing researcher.
SomeBitchIKnow can investigate and research everything she puts her mind to.
Or she/he/they just steals shit from truly deep researchers, and if anyone calls it out, it earns them a ban.
The researchers may actually work for he/she/them..... who knows?
But how many people are on point 24/7/365, when they have not had any time to do any actual research?
Edit: deleted double preposition at “on point”, and changed “have net had any time” to “have not had any time”
I have no idea.
But since we all in this together does credit really matter?. Problem is we all anons and we all been banned and changed accounts so much.
and information is shared 24/7 and udated etc.
The only important thing is information is coming out.
I’d not seen that before, and I appreciate Wikipedia having the changes documented, and the discussion, so we can see it all. I wonder if there are instances of people on the inside “editing” these discussion threads.
Wow! I had no idea...haven't used Wikipedia for years but good to know!
My goodness! I had no Idea, Is his a digital battleground we can influence ie. red pill blue links or google docs etc? wha would be a viable way to use this for good?
Best use of your time is to tell people who will listen to ignore wikipedia as it's garbage and ran by the JIDF.
On the editable pages that might be true but there are many more that you cannot....
WWG1WGA