This isn’t going to be a mistrial. This will end in a jury acquittal or a bench directed acquittal. This judge is legit & this prosecutor is on a leftwing persecution crusade. Not gonna work out.
Prosecutorial misconduct charges need to be filed as a result of this trial.
It didn't help him to have to admit he drove there without a driver's license, broke a curfew, had a gun he had no legal right to own or carry.
You know, I've thought this from when this occurred - what in the hell were his parents doing? I don't care if he was almost 18, he wasn't 18 and was still a child.
Now this is important, also don't most states have probationary licenses for 17 year Olds? Idk the details but if he was 17 he should have atleast qualified for that pending he had his permit 1st
In many jurisdictions, an adult gun owner can allow someone under 18 to hold/use their gun (think hunting scenarios). Various stipulations can apply (min age 14, within arms length, under supervision, to a youth with firearms training, etc.).
This is awesome info that I wasn't expecting to get, however reading my comment over I meant to refer to driving license sine someone said he drive with out a license
I must have misheard his testimony. I know he was asked about a permit to carry a gun underage and he said he didn't know he needed one, applied for one later but it was put on hold because of the charges against him.
At any rate, I don't think it helped him to have to admit that he essentially ignored several laws he was breaking that night. I don't think that outweighs the fact that he was defending himself but I'm not a juror.
That is not what I heard in his own testimony today. But whatever. You all apparently think he didn't break any laws and didn't hurt his chances of getting acquitted if he did, even though he didn't.
I hope he didn't hurt his case. I don't think he should have been prosecuted for the shootings at all. But you all apparently think I'm the enemy here, not running amok prosecutors.
I saw on another site that a mistrial with prejudice doesn't allow for a retrial but it also gets the jurors off the hook. Remember there were threats of doxxing, etc. I can see this happening.
This isn’t going to be a mistrial. This will end in a jury acquittal or a bench directed acquittal. This judge is legit & this prosecutor is on a leftwing persecution crusade. Not gonna work out.
Prosecutorial misconduct charges need to be filed as a result of this trial.
Props to Kyle, this guy is such a dick.
Kyle taking the stand is stupid.
It didn't help him to have to admit he drove there without a driver's license, broke a curfew, had a gun he had no legal right to own or carry.
You know, I've thought this from when this occurred - what in the hell were his parents doing? I don't care if he was almost 18, he wasn't 18 and was still a child.
He did not have the legal right to own it. He did have the legal right to posses (carry) it.
Now this is important, also don't most states have probationary licenses for 17 year Olds? Idk the details but if he was 17 he should have atleast qualified for that pending he had his permit 1st
In many jurisdictions, an adult gun owner can allow someone under 18 to hold/use their gun (think hunting scenarios). Various stipulations can apply (min age 14, within arms length, under supervision, to a youth with firearms training, etc.).
This is awesome info that I wasn't expecting to get, however reading my comment over I meant to refer to driving license sine someone said he drive with out a license
I must have misheard his testimony. I know he was asked about a permit to carry a gun underage and he said he didn't know he needed one, applied for one later but it was put on hold because of the charges against him.
At any rate, I don't think it helped him to have to admit that he essentially ignored several laws he was breaking that night. I don't think that outweighs the fact that he was defending himself but I'm not a juror.
He needed one in IL, not in WI.
KR broke zero gun possession or transport laws. That is why hes not charged with any.
That is not what I heard in his own testimony today. But whatever. You all apparently think he didn't break any laws and didn't hurt his chances of getting acquitted if he did, even though he didn't.
I hope he didn't hurt his case. I don't think he should have been prosecuted for the shootings at all. But you all apparently think I'm the enemy here, not running amok prosecutors.
Constitution says he has he right to own and carry a gun.
Yeah, prosecution just tried some shit and the judge went off on the prosecution.
No, and this is why the 5th Amendment exists. It's also why you have the right to remain silent.
When it comes to testimony, police and attorneys are far more skilled than the average Joe is. It's like going into the ring with a heavyweight boxer.
The police and attorneys play all sorts of games to screw people over all the time.
Video you need to watch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-7o9xYp7eE
Goes for attorneys as well.
I saw on another site that a mistrial with prejudice doesn't allow for a retrial but it also gets the jurors off the hook. Remember there were threats of doxxing, etc. I can see this happening.
acquittal, acquittal, acquittal, acquittal
And again, acquittal
Finally, acquittal
Let's go Kyle!