Thinking the tests "were stupid" is her cover. Her real motive was to subvert the military. These people aren't like Scooby Doo villians that admit their motives once they are unmasked.
The fact is few if any women have the capability for abstract thinking that typically male dominated careers have. A womans reproduction is virtually assured whatever she is in terms of looks or intelligence. Yet for tens of thousands of years probably the only men who reproduced were either incredibly physically dominant or were clever enough to think their way out of problems and the fact is most women throughout history reproduced. Most men didn't.
Well, I look like a deer caught in the headlights, but, when I speak, people are surprised I can form complete sentences in what I have been told "perfect diction".
Women most certainly can and do have just as much capacity for "abstract thinking" for jobs or otherwise as men do. I've met many skilled and extremely knowledgeable women in my career as a programmer. I've known women who could run circles around me when designing systems architectures.
Any woman is capable of such things at the same capacity as men, there's no real difference except that women aren't given as many opportunities in schools and jobs. When they're given the opportunity, people like you screech about "diversity hires" as if women can't be hired on their accomplishments and merits alone. Pretty damn sexist of you and others to think women aren't capable of such things.
I don't deny women with the capability for abstract thinking exist. I'm saying that they are extremely rare. Autism and high IQ's and the ability at abstract thinking are much rarer in women than they are in men. Women trend average. Men are more widely distributed on the Bell Curve meaning exceptional men and low quality men are more common. Exceptional women in that area are probably at a ratio of 1 woman to every 20 men.
Womens domain is the home. Mens domain is the civilisation. This is where talents are best focused. Instead our civilisation devotes enormous resources to having women out there LARPing as men.
You are either arguing in bad faith or got lost trying to find r/politics if you believe any of that. Women make up the majority in higher education. Women control the HR departments at corporations. Diversity quotas are very much a thing. I've seen it at work first hand - between the diversity hires and the bean counters the company I work for is dying on its feet.
Thinking the tests "were stupid" is her cover. Her real motive was to subvert the military. These people aren't like Scooby Doo villians that admit their motives once they are unmasked.
Is she a Democrat? If so they are above the law.
The fact is few if any women have the capability for abstract thinking that typically male dominated careers have. A womans reproduction is virtually assured whatever she is in terms of looks or intelligence. Yet for tens of thousands of years probably the only men who reproduced were either incredibly physically dominant or were clever enough to think their way out of problems and the fact is most women throughout history reproduced. Most men didn't.
Well, I look like a deer caught in the headlights, but, when I speak, people are surprised I can form complete sentences in what I have been told "perfect diction".
Women most certainly can and do have just as much capacity for "abstract thinking" for jobs or otherwise as men do. I've met many skilled and extremely knowledgeable women in my career as a programmer. I've known women who could run circles around me when designing systems architectures.
Any woman is capable of such things at the same capacity as men, there's no real difference except that women aren't given as many opportunities in schools and jobs. When they're given the opportunity, people like you screech about "diversity hires" as if women can't be hired on their accomplishments and merits alone. Pretty damn sexist of you and others to think women aren't capable of such things.
I don't deny women with the capability for abstract thinking exist. I'm saying that they are extremely rare. Autism and high IQ's and the ability at abstract thinking are much rarer in women than they are in men. Women trend average. Men are more widely distributed on the Bell Curve meaning exceptional men and low quality men are more common. Exceptional women in that area are probably at a ratio of 1 woman to every 20 men.
Womens domain is the home. Mens domain is the civilisation. This is where talents are best focused. Instead our civilisation devotes enormous resources to having women out there LARPing as men.
You are either arguing in bad faith or got lost trying to find r/politics if you believe any of that. Women make up the majority in higher education. Women control the HR departments at corporations. Diversity quotas are very much a thing. I've seen it at work first hand - between the diversity hires and the bean counters the company I work for is dying on its feet.