Synchronicity, Fren. It's becoming more and more common as days pass.
As far as the Pentagon, that was a cruise missile, not a plane. Speaking as former Air Force Aircraft Mishap Investigator (one of many hats I wore) and up close inspection of buildings hit by cruise missiles in Iraq. Same exact signature and is the reason all the external cameras were confiscated by the FBI (which some have since leaked).
Why do you think they used a cruise missile as opposed to using planes at the WTC and what do you think happened to the flight in question?
Cruise missile hit the Pentagon, not the WTC's. If you want me to explain how I know this, I can give a concise thesis. The WTC's were controlled Demo. Many vids may still exist of close-ups of molten metal pouring from specific locations around the buildings in proximity of impacts, NOT the impact zones. Molten metal, away from the impact zone means high-grade Thermite cutting steel beams and, in fact, aftermath photos shows exactly that: Main steel support beams cut perfectly diagonal, all the same way. Cleanup crews on the ground testified cordite smells (explosives) and thermite still burning underground.
If it interests you at all, this is indeed a rabbit hole in which to plunge. A lot of the info is getting harder and harder to find though, so be prepared for that.
"Why do you think they used a cruise missile as opposed to using planes at the WTC and what do you think happened to the flight in question?"
I kind of phrased that badly. I did not mean that they used missiles at the WTC but why use one at the Pentagon?
What I don't understand regarding this whole controlled demo theory is why? Why add 100,000's of detonators and shaped charges, kilometers of det cord and make the plan thousands and thousands of times more complex and hard to conceal. So what if the WTC toppled and took out a huge area, the false flag would have been even bigger.
If they were worried about people demanding a nuclear reprisal they could have picked a smaller target, not rigged the whole WTC with shaped charges.
What a trip, I just posted the same video as you atlthough I posted it regarding the lack of damage at the pentagon
This does not account for what I said about the fuel.
Synchronicity, Fren. It's becoming more and more common as days pass.
As far as the Pentagon, that was a cruise missile, not a plane. Speaking as former Air Force Aircraft Mishap Investigator (one of many hats I wore) and up close inspection of buildings hit by cruise missiles in Iraq. Same exact signature and is the reason all the external cameras were confiscated by the FBI (which some have since leaked).
I should probably check some more of this rabbit hole out, but it's got to stand in line and take a number at the moment as there is a queue.
Why do you think they used a cruise missile as opposed to using planes at the WTC and what do you think happened to the flight in question?
Gotta crash, take it easy.
Cruise missile hit the Pentagon, not the WTC's. If you want me to explain how I know this, I can give a concise thesis. The WTC's were controlled Demo. Many vids may still exist of close-ups of molten metal pouring from specific locations around the buildings in proximity of impacts, NOT the impact zones. Molten metal, away from the impact zone means high-grade Thermite cutting steel beams and, in fact, aftermath photos shows exactly that: Main steel support beams cut perfectly diagonal, all the same way. Cleanup crews on the ground testified cordite smells (explosives) and thermite still burning underground.
If it interests you at all, this is indeed a rabbit hole in which to plunge. A lot of the info is getting harder and harder to find though, so be prepared for that.
"Why do you think they used a cruise missile as opposed to using planes at the WTC and what do you think happened to the flight in question?"
I kind of phrased that badly. I did not mean that they used missiles at the WTC but why use one at the Pentagon?
What I don't understand regarding this whole controlled demo theory is why? Why add 100,000's of detonators and shaped charges, kilometers of det cord and make the plan thousands and thousands of times more complex and hard to conceal. So what if the WTC toppled and took out a huge area, the false flag would have been even bigger.
If they were worried about people demanding a nuclear reprisal they could have picked a smaller target, not rigged the whole WTC with shaped charges.
It does not make any sense to me.