Oops. Their Covid narrative got peer reviewed in The Lancet (now officially printed on toilet paper to save time). "Why is this SO important? The 1905 SCOTUS case Jacobson v Mass. held that mandates can only be considered to “prevent the spread of contagious disease.” And now, OOPS, they DON'T
(media.greatawakening.win)
⚠️ Vax-tarded ☠️
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (57)
sorted by:
That's fantastic work!
The other reason that they are illegal is because there are non-experimental effective treatments available ie. ivermectin and HCQ. It's why these treatments have been suppressed so hard.
How do we hold them to account?
What about the FDA approved Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine is not even being available in this country. There is a legal difference in the two Pfizer shots.
What the hell is “Comirnaty” supposed to mean? Is it a comm?