she makes a few comments here and there about interesting things, but usually at the insistent prompting by the interviewer who asks questions in an either/or type fashion so that she has to answer in an interesting way. However, she provides no real evidence or much to back up any of her claims beyond "close contact" with boris and others in parlement. So we have to rely on her word alone. And unfortunately throughout the interview she proves to the listener that her word is worth nothing, and that she is very self-centered and not to be trusted about anything, let alone about gossip about her ex-lover. So anyone watching this video with an open mind will not come away having discovered anything new, and anyone already awake watching this video will simply be wasting their time. so what good is this video other than to turn away those who might be interested but are not awake. thats my 2 cents about it after watching half the video.
The questions about the love affair are the fault of the interviewer, he seem to get stuck on it. But if you get past that, its quite insightful.
she makes a few comments here and there about interesting things, but usually at the insistent prompting by the interviewer who asks questions in an either/or type fashion so that she has to answer in an interesting way. However, she provides no real evidence or much to back up any of her claims beyond "close contact" with boris and others in parlement. So we have to rely on her word alone. And unfortunately throughout the interview she proves to the listener that her word is worth nothing, and that she is very self-centered and not to be trusted about anything, let alone about gossip about her ex-lover. So anyone watching this video with an open mind will not come away having discovered anything new, and anyone already awake watching this video will simply be wasting their time. so what good is this video other than to turn away those who might be interested but are not awake. thats my 2 cents about it after watching half the video.