"it's just a mandate, mandates are not law".
On the surface this is a correct and perfectly logical statement. But know why I don't like it?
What happens if our corrupt and illegitimate Congress makes it a law? Now we have shot ourselves in the foot by implying we have to follow it because it's law. I don't care if they make a law that says you have to get the jab or face a firing squad, I'm not gonna follow unjust laws.
It kinda reminds me of the line I heard a lot and have even been guilty of saying myself "it's not even FDA approved"... Until it was. Then what? We all had to change our line of thinking. Good logic does not require this kind of tweaking.
Maybe I'm just being pedantic but I wanted to give my two cents. Thoughts on this?
But its still not FDA approved. So theres that.
Yes. Came here to say this!
It's Schrodinger's jab. It is FDA approved and it's also not.
It is very simple. There isnt a Covid-19 related "vaccine" = Gene Therapy injection approved by the FDA in the US. Repeating headlines from the MSM that the vaccine is FDA approved is not in the best interest of anyone.
Yet we had users say they specifically saw comirnaty on vials. The name comes after approval.
You think the FDA is a bastion of trustworthy bureaucracy? You think that part of government is noble and the rest isn't?
Not sure what you are getting at here really. I think the FDA is a pile of garbage centered around all people sick based on their approvals of almost everything they have their dirty fingers in.
Comirnaty, BioNTech may very well be on vials. I doubt they were in the US. If they were that is even more issues involved. The approval however was for the continued study of that particular brand of the Gene therapy injection. Ive read all the documents associated with the FDA "approval". My point of this comment however, was to point out the OP stating the vaccine is FDA approved as an example of choosing what not to say.