The British government has spilled the beans about that fact that once you get double jabbed, you will never again be able to acquire full natural immunity. In its Week 42 “COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report,” the U.K. Health Security Agency admitted on page 23 that “N antibody levels appear to be lower in people who acquire infection following two doses of vaccination.” It goes on to explain that this antibody drop is basically permanent.
What’s this mean?
We know the vaccines do not stop infection or transmission of the virus (in fact, the report shows elsewhere that vaccinated adults are now being infected at much HIGHER rates than the unvaccinated).
What the British are saying is they are now finding the vaccine interferes with your body’s innate ability after infection to produce antibodies against not just the spike protein but other pieces of the virus. Specifically, vaccinated people don’t seem to be producing antibodies to the nucleocapsid protein, the shell of the virus, which are a crucial part of the response in unvaccinated people.
In the long term, people who take the vaccine will be far more vulnerable to any mutations in the spike protein that might come along, even if they have already been infected and recovered once, or more than once.
The unvaccinated, meanwhile, will procure lasting, if not permanent, immunity to all strains of the alleged virus after being infected with it naturally even just once. Read it yourself.. Page 24.
Quality post Needs sticky.
Thanks fren
That doc from Idaho spells it out very clear. If your body was naturally suppressing any diseases it was exposed to thisnshot system will make sure to ruin your immunity so those once beat back diseases can proliferate and likley kill you.
Anecdotal Bias Man here! Since taking the experimental shots, people in my friends group experienced the following:
-sudden onset of [the least deadly version of] leukemia
-cancerous cells found in breast tissue not long after shot, requiring immediate surgery and beginning of treatment
-return of cancerous cells to someone in remission
-as of yet unexplained fatigue and loss of motor function, effectively ruining friend’s career requiring precise use of fingers
Happening out of nowhere, singularly? I wouldn’t raise an eyebrow. Four people in my immediate circle come down with life altering illnesses? All after they take these shots? I dunno.
Anecdotal Bias Man awaaaaaay.
My cousin has had Covid twice. Really sick each time, even with horse paste the second time, although it probably kept her out of the hospital. How do we explain people getting Covid twice by this theory?
And I don’t trust any Brit reports about Covid. They’re in charge of doing so-called “research” on the vax, but they’re as Deep State as you can get. I don’t trust them or their damn studies.
was she tested both times ---- if so could have had covid once and a bad flu the other time. many with a cold or flu will test positive for covid via bullshit overcycle pcr tests
It can happen twice, because of virus mutation. This happens in naturally with the flu as well.
The situation is worsened by the vaccine, which (because it is leaky) leads to creation of more virulent mutations.
Hopefully, the second time was better than the first, because of the first bout.
I experienced this myself, after a longish bout last year, I had a couple of days this year. Horse paste helped, along with Vit D, C, Zinc, Quercetin.
nothing is 100%
It's going to be a long haul for those people, unless they get the short haul.
I think a suitable punishment for the perpetrators of this crime would be to get a new jab of their poison vaccine every day until the inevitable happens. I would pity none of them.
Fyi: archived link https://archive.md/0YiNc
I must not be very smart, or maybe I am not seeing some very fine print between the lines of text on page 24, because I am not able to translate the pg. 24 text into what is your interpretation of that page says.
What skullduggery is this?
Yes, we don't have enough people in the country to accommodate the next model.
You can slap an "estimate" on anything and pass it off as real data.
For example, NYS had the harshest covid policies (and some of the worst numbers) in the country. All Cuomo had to say to make it palatable was "We estimate things would be worse if we didn't take these measures."
When pressed for data, he showed that restaurants and bars were ~1% responsible for COVID cases, while spread in households was responsible for ~70%. The first policies he made? Lock everyone in their homes and shut the restaurants.
This could be primed for the Small Pox?
Can you please cite the line that explains this? I don't know if I'm missing it, but I've re-read twice. I do see that it says that (for the vacccinated) that "then from June through September the profile of antibody levels in these cohorts gradually DECREASES"
But where is the portion on page 24 that says that about natural immunity?
I agree with your assessment but don't see it directly on page 24. Thank you
I see the first part, where does it essentially say it's permanent?
In August, Israel noticed that there was a 6x increased likelihood of the vaccinated becoming infected, than the previously infected becoming reinfected.
Of course, the CDC couldn't let that stand. So it published a report that said the unvaccinated, previously infected were 2x more likely to get reinfected than the vaccinated. Buried very deeply in that report was this: "the vaccinated had a .5% chance of infection, the unvaccinated had a 1% chance of reinfection." Even though the numbers are still strong to support natural immunity (a 1% chance of reinfection?!), the report had limitations that I feel undermine it.
Fast forward to last week. Minnesota becomes the first state in the country to report "reinfections." The article is clearly written to scare you into getting vaccinated. However, it made two very strange references: the focus of the article was a school teacher who has had COVID twice (once before being vaccinated, and once after being vaccinated - three exposures total.) So, she should have a billion antibodies by now - or something strange is going on with her.
The article than says "of all new COVID cases 1% are reinfections" (that jives well with the CDC's report.) But, it then goes on to state "of all new cases 1.8% are breakthroughs in the vaccinated."
For those paying attention at home: you are more likely to get infected after vaccination (1.8%) than you are reinfected. (1%) A total reversal of the CDC's report.
Thank you for reposting!!
there is no page 30, wiseass.