He promised no vaccine mandates, and he hsn't placed one. BUT................................ He did sign an order allowing any school, business, or county/town/city leaders to impose them at will. Any bets on if he retracts this, or allows it to go forward? My money is on the later.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
I see your point, Lapstrake. But I also see this:
If you are a liberal town full of Satanic pedos, I think they should allowed to do that ridiculous shit if they want. People can move.
We're a constitutional republic; unlike a pure democracy, individual rights are sacred and not up for revocation by vote or anything else. FORCING people to have the Poison Death Shot (thank you, Dr. Zelenko!) injected into one's body in order to participate in public life or to actually avoid arrest and possibly worse is NOT something that any civilized society would condone, and it's certain that the Founders wouldn't condone it.
Yes, if private businesses or other organizations want to require customers to be "vaxxed" that is (incredibly stupid and suicidal but) different; allowing "county/town/city leaders" to impose mandates is clearly a violation of individual rights, however.
Legally, if nothing else, the 4th Amendment and the 9th Amendment together seem to clearly protect against any such assault being forced upon one's person.
Amendment IX The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Sure, the courts have generally ignored the 9th Amendment, but then again they've ignored most of the Constitution and Common Law -- so what? We're trying to restore freedom in this country, so anti-freedom legal precedent is just another category we need to sweep away.
Did you just put words in my mouth and then criticize your own words that you put there?
We all know who does that.
I am totally against vaccine mandates. Have a nice evening, fren.
For crying out loud, I did no such thing -- and you can't be possibly really think I did.
I replaced your "mask/vaccine Karens" with another example (and highlighted it) of people who use force against others -- a more severe example to make a point. Your original sentence is right above my response in your own response.
And for that matter, with it now clear that the "vaccines" are bioweapons that are killing many thousands of people and badly injuring many more, how is a government "vaccine" mandate any less offensive than "Satanic pedos?"
Hell, it's "Satanic pedos" who are likely at the upper echelons of pushing this depopulation mass-murder agenda on us.
Sorry for triggering you, but forcing children and adults to get injected with poison isn't my idea of something mildly irritating, as "mask/vaccine Karens" suggests.
Edit: I've re-read my response and will say that although it seemed clear to me what I was doing with my example of "Satanic pedos" it would have been better to have added text explaining that. So, my apologies. I certainly didn't mean to miss-characterize your comment.
I see your point, Narg. But dude, Mask Karens ≠ Satanic Pedos. Masking yourself is not the same as raping innocent children who have no means of protecting themselves or moving away.
Masks aren't the only thing at issue; the Gov will allow for cities, towns and counties to mandate a bioweapon being injected into children and adults.
Mostly right on. But a business cannot violate your Rights in the same way a business cannot violate the law. I wish people would stop with this. The only way any entity can deprive you of a Right is through contract. It is true however, that businesses and governments use disguised contracts all the time to get us to surrender our Rights.