It's not the fact they lied that pisses me off, it's the fact the Judge just limply sat there and allowed this manipulated digital crap in his courtroom
He was so close to ordering a separate hearing for that evidence and putting council under oath. Then the next thing I know he’s saying maybe the jury will do his job so he doesn’t have to make a decision.
I think was DS all along... idk... I seem to be only one that doesn't trust that judge, I hope I'm wrong, but my guts are warning me ... I hope I'm wrong and there's good people out there, but this trial has been a shit show from the get go.
That makes sense if they did all of these things to expose their corrupt conduct, for example the edited video. I can see why defense yesterday was missing most opportunities to counter their arguments and completely destroy them. I was wondering why they didn't barely do anything during those moments, now I am understanding it's like don't interrupt an enemy destroying themselves entirely in the process.
The judge is simply ignorant about the tech and he knows it. You can see the look on his face, everyting in him is telling him the prosecution is lying, but he doesn't understand the tech well enough to craft an argument to throw at them. He wants the defense lawyers to bring in an expert to explain it. He's stuck where he is.
It's not the fact they lied that pisses me off, it's the fact the Judge just limply sat there and allowed this manipulated digital crap in his courtroom
He was so close to ordering a separate hearing for that evidence and putting council under oath. Then the next thing I know he’s saying maybe the jury will do his job so he doesn’t have to make a decision.
I wonder if the DS/threats got to him.
I think was DS all along... idk... I seem to be only one that doesn't trust that judge, I hope I'm wrong, but my guts are warning me ... I hope I'm wrong and there's good people out there, but this trial has been a shit show from the get go.
Amen, don’t trust anybody.
Could it all be in part of the White Hats plans for take downs of bad actors?
That makes sense if they did all of these things to expose their corrupt conduct, for example the edited video. I can see why defense yesterday was missing most opportunities to counter their arguments and completely destroy them. I was wondering why they didn't barely do anything during those moments, now I am understanding it's like don't interrupt an enemy destroying themselves entirely in the process.
The judge is simply ignorant about the tech and he knows it. You can see the look on his face, everyting in him is telling him the prosecution is lying, but he doesn't understand the tech well enough to craft an argument to throw at them. He wants the defense lawyers to bring in an expert to explain it. He's stuck where he is.
Is someone bri he evidence in that he doesn't understand he has the obligation to have proof that the evidence is true m, clean and Unmessed with.
If you can prove it's original it's not allowed.
I think you’re right. I think lawyers will now need a tech aid at all times to point out technology fraud